Photo on Raw by Daniele Occhiato

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

6.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Solo raw e prove varie... View gallery (59 photos)

Photo on Raw by Daniele Occhiato sent on February 10, 2024 (11:14) by Mmulinai. 4 comments, 348 views.

at 800mm, 1/320 f/9.0, ISO 1600,

View High Resolution 6.0 MP

8 persons like it: Ambrogio60, Dtmix, Enrico, Ignatius, Ilario Frassinelli, MarcoVeronese76, Thum, _Axl_

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 245000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Thum	sent on February 10, 2024 (11:19) Nice background

Mmulinai

sent on February 10, 2024 (11:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks Thum, it's just the test of processing a file by Daniele Occhiato made with r7 and 200-800.

_Axl_

sent on February 10, 2024 (15:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Mario, what do you think of this R7 200-800 combination after working on the file?

Mmulinai

sent on February 10, 2024 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As I had announced, the lens is very good, I reserve the right to evaluate it with a better light to understand the possible difference with the 100-500, so I would say that the smooth performance is better than the 100,500 multiplied but it is only a feeling. From smooth the feeling is that the 100-500 is sharper, but we are talking first of all about sensations and then about the sex of the angels.
Marginal differences that in an error-free shot are reset with the post.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.