RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape with human elements
  4. » Defect in the optics?

 
Defect in the optics?...

Varie

View gallery (17 photos)

Defect in the optics? sent on February 01, 2024 (14:28) by Saveriocz. 13 comments, 273 views. [retina]

at 28mm, 30 sec f/9.0, ISO 100, tripod.




View High Resolution 24.3 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 01, 2024 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very good workmanship. Hello

avatarsenior
sent on February 01, 2024 (23:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Daniele, glad you like it, even if I actually published it just to highlight the cloud of flares that pierces the top of the photo, in the hope that other users with the same lens can clarify to me if it is an ordinary phenomenon on the 24-85 I use or if my specimen could have, as I believe, specific defects. Good evening.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 05, 2024 (0:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

There is actually something wrong, beyond the interesting shot. Too many flares and so clustered, it looks like it's wet with droplets... Mold or mildew inside?

avatarsenior
sent on February 05, 2024 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Claudio, thanks for the comment. No, nothing like you say, when it came to me (used) at a simple visual inspection the windows seemed absolutely fine. Anyway I returned it and they refunded me, at least from that point of view I solved it. Thanks again, bye.

avatarsenior
sent on February 05, 2024 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Despite the defect of the optics, the image is very striking! Congratulations Saverio and greetings, Massimiliano

avatarsenior
sent on February 05, 2024 (22:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you MassiCricco for your appreciation. Tropea is a location that always gives ideas to take beautiful shots. Good evening.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 07, 2024 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice whole series. Hi Corrado

avatarsenior
sent on February 07, 2024 (17:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Corrado, happy for your opinion. Buonasera.

avatarsenior
sent on February 12, 2024 (23:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wonderful Saverio !!

avatarsenior
sent on February 13, 2024 (13:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Gion, it wasn't one of the ones I wanted to publish, but your opinion is very pleasing. Hello.

avatarsenior
sent on September 13, 2024 (13:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

in my opinion that lens (if new) did not have a good match in a group of lenses, especially on the front ED ones. If it worked well only in telephoto or when the lens groups are set back and do not suffer direct rays, especially at night when they are more enhanced, then it is defective because those reflections should have been more colored almost to disappear and instead they are whitish, which happens only in non-ED lenses (from 100€ to be clear) Bravo the seller who gave you back the money instead of making you a good
giò

avatarsenior
sent on September 13, 2024 (14:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Giò.
As long as I had it, it made attempts at various focal lengths and, on each zoom, even with different apertures; if I remember correctly I ranged from F7.1 to F16, without, practically, any variation in the result.
Reflections appeared even if the light sources were out of the frame, a set of situations that immediately made me doubt the condition of the lens, even if it seemed new in the package.
I agree with you on the seller, EXEMPLARY behavior, also considering that I kept it for a couple of months.
Thank you for the passage.

avatarsenior
sent on September 13, 2024 (14:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

great
hello see you soon
giò




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me