What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user148381 | sent on January 28, 2024 (16:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe it's the light of the time when the photo was taken and in the background the 45 megapixels can be "seen"
The lenses with the highest brightness are great for certain images (portraits) but, at least for what little I know, they are softer than a less bright lens therefore with less incisiveness.
I seem to notice this also on the image in the foreground
Or am I wrong?
Off course yes
Good evening Forse è la luce dell'ora in cui è stata scattata la foto o sullo sfondo i 45 megapixels si "vedono"
Gli obiettivi con la massima luminosità sono ottimi per certe immagini (ritratti) ma, almeno per quel poco che so, sono più morbidi di un obiettivo meno luminoso quindi con una minor incisività.
Questo mi pare di notarlo anche sulla immagine in primo piano
O mi sbaglio?
Of course I speak out of envy. Perhaps
Buona serata |
| sent on January 28, 2024 (16:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Noct 58mm is really sharp at any distance, both in the close-up and with distant subjects :-) This photo is not a good example, I published it anyway because I liked the scene but as you (rightly) noticed the sharpness is not great, but because of inaccuracy of focus and not for the performance of the lens. Il Noct 58mm è davvero nitidissimo a qualsiasi distanza, sia nel primo piano che con soggetti lontani:-) Questa foto però non ne è un buon esempio, l'ho pubblicata comunque perché mi piaceva la scena ma come (giustamente) hai notato la nitidezza non è un granché, ma a causa di imprecisione di messa a fuoco e non per la resa dell'ottica. |
user148381 | sent on January 28, 2024 (17:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for your reply
Greetings Ringrazio per la risposta
Saluti |
| sent on January 29, 2024 (1:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and composed great.
;-) Bellissima e composta alla grande.
 |
| sent on January 29, 2024 (9:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's a shame that the MAF ended up at the height of the boot on the left, this in my opinion is the most beautiful photo that does justice to such a wide opening (I'm talking about an ambient portrait).
The optics are really stratospheric. peccato che la maf sia finita all'altezza dello stivale a sx, questa secondo me è la foto più bella che rende giustizia a un'apertura così ampia (parlo di ritratto ambientato).
L'ottica è davvero stratosferica.. |
| sent on January 30, 2024 (17:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beyond the photographic aspect, I can ask you, among the many trips you have made, which is the most beautiful country you have visited and that has particularly impressed you? Al di là dell'aspetto fotografico posso chiederti, tra i tanti viaggi che hai fatto, qual è il paese più bello che hai visitato e che ti ha colpito in particolar modo? |
| sent on January 30, 2024 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to imagine the dynamic range of the sensor. I don't see any violent lights... but at 800iso the white salt and the black trousers seem to hold. Cerco di immaginare la gamma dinamica del sensore.. non vedo luci violente... ma a 800iso il sale bianchissimo ed il pantalone nero pare tenere. |
| sent on February 03, 2024 (1:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wonder if you have identified what you need to send for service when you return, whether the lens or the camera body, to solve the problem of the aperture block.
Lucky it was wide open.
However, it went more than well for you because if it had jammed at f22, I would have seen it very hard to use it for you, indeed little but sure that it would have sent you into a black crisis. :-D Mi chiedo se hai identificato cosa al rientro tu debba mandare in assistenza, se l'ottica o il corpo macchina, per risolvere il problema avuto del blocco dei diaframmi.
Fortunato che fosse a tutta apertura.
Ti è comunque andata più che bene perchè se si fosse inceppato a f22, l'avrei vista assai dura utilizzarlo per te, anzi poco ma sicuro che ti avrebbe mandato in crisi nera.  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
