What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 22, 2024 (9:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo as beautiful as all the others.
It's amazing your ability to manually fire a 0.95, I can't even with a 35 2.8
Foto bellissima come tutte le altre.
E' incredibile la tua capacità di mettere a fuco manuale uno 0.95, io non riesco nemmeno con un 35 2.8
|
| sent on January 22, 2024 (14:10) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on January 22, 2024 (15:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gee..!!!!
If you can focus, the results seem exceptional to me!! Caspita..!!!!
Se riesci a mettere a fuoco i risultati mi sembrano eccezzionali!! |
| sent on January 22, 2024 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Seen from the phone, there is no blur of the planes to seem artificial... almost processed by software. Of course, focusing is not always easy...
Stuart
Vista da telefono no c'è una sfocatura dei piani da sembrare artefatta...quasi elaborata via software. Certo mettere a fuoco non è sempre facile...
Stefano
|
| sent on January 22, 2024 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow beautiful. Dino. Wow bellissima. Dino. |
| sent on January 22, 2024 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow beautiful. Dino. Wow bellissima. Dino. |
| sent on January 22, 2024 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry Emanuele, I know the review of this equipment will come, but will you show us some shots maybe at f/1.8 or 2.0?
For me it would be very interesting, not because I will ever buy this lens but to get an idea of how certain monsters render in terms of blur progression. I can't think that this masterpiece of a lens is only fantastic at f0.95.
In this image, for example, I'm sure it would have maintained a fantastic detachment, guaranteeing more ambience by closing a bit.
The photo is beautiful eh... Anyway, I hope I've made myself clear. ;-) Scusa Emanuele, so che arriverà la recensione di questa attrezzatura, ma ci farai vedere qualche scatto magari a f/1.8 o a 2.0?
Per me sarebbe molto interessante, non perché comprerò mai questa lente ma per farmi l'idea di come rendono certi mostri a livello di progressione dello sfocato. Non posso pensare che questo capolavoro di lente sia fantastico solo a f0,95.
In questa immagine ad esempio sono sicuro che avrebbe mantenuto uno stacco fantastico garantendo maggiore ambientazione chiudendo un po'.
Qui sembra l'effetto miniatura messo in verticale 
La foto è bellissima eh... Comunque spero di essermi spiegato.  |
| sent on January 23, 2024 (0:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't see very little for a 0.95.
Once upon a time on this type of scene it was closed as much as possible, diffraction aside, today it is fashionable to detach the main subject from the background regardless.
Anyway, the photo is nice but we would like to see some similar scenes with a smaller aperture.
Io pdc non è che ne vedo proprio poca per un 0,95.
Una volta su questo tipo di scena si chiudeva il più possibile, diffrazione a parte, oggi è di moda staccare il soggetto principale dallo sfondo a prescindere.
Cmq la foto è bella ma qualche scena simile con diaframma più chiuso ci piacerebbe vederla.
|
| sent on January 23, 2024 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Manual fire? Crazy. Congratulations Fuoco manuale? Pazzesco. Complimenti |
| sent on January 23, 2024 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How I would love to see the engine pushing this boat fast with a blonde lady on the lookout.
A cordial greeting from Italy
Patrizio Quanto mi piacerebbe vedere il motore che spinge veloce questa barca con una bionda signora di vedetta.
Un saluto cordiale dall'Italia
Patrizio |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To me it seems to give a nice feeling of three-dimensionality A me sembra dare una bella sensazione di tridimensionalità |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shocking, a photo that is worth the trip and probably the purchase of this lens. Sconvolgente, una foto che vale il viaggio e probabilmente l'acquisto di questa lente. |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (16:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But if it had been made clear by subbbeto that the mission was TA or nothing , what do you "exploit" to do? :-D
10 to this fantastic optics
10 and praise to Emanuele for having managed to tame the monster in this scene with a moving subject!!
Ma se era stato chiarito da subbbeto che la mission era TA or nothing , che "sfruguliate" a fà?
10 a questa ottica fantastica
10 e lode a Emanuele per essere riuscito a domare il mostro in questo scena con soggetto in movimento!!!
|
user207727 | sent on January 24, 2024 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Honestly, to my taste, he posted better ones. The boat is cut and half blurred, which is very disturbing. The subject is filmed from behind and its context (fruit) is half focus and half not. The wider context is not definable but a more wide-angle view in my opinion would have helped. Well, yes the wow effect is there, colors and lights are beautiful, the manual focus has been used well considering the movement but in my opinion it goes little beyond these two things. Sinceramente, a gusto mio, ne ha postate di migliori. La barca è tagliata e mezza sfocata, cosa che disturba parecchio. Il soggetto è ripreso di spalle e il suo contesto (frutta) è mezzo a fuoco e mezzo no. Il contesto più ampio non è definibile ma una visione più grandangolare a mio avviso avrebbe aiutato. Boh, si l'effetto wow ci sta, colori e luci sono belli, il manual focus è stato usato bene considerato il movimento ma a mio avviso si va poco oltre queste due cose. Anche perché il titolo è: Il mercato galleggiante ma non mi pare sia valorizzato il mercato. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
