Wreck (F. Po) | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

2.2 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Landscape View gallery (15 photos)

Wreck (F. Po) sent on May 27, 2013 (13:59) by Silvide. 10 comments, 1466 views.

f/11.0, ISO 200, tripod.

Tamron SP 20-40 f/2,7-3,5 AFD. HDR di 5 esposizioni. Ho inserito una versione in HD con le correzioni suggeritomi da Caterina (che ringrazio) ;-) #Fiumi

View High Resolution 2.2 MP

22 persons like it: Adrimas51, Andrea Cacciari, Andrynoce, Claudio Sferra, Damicfra, Dantes, Dario_ma, Datta, Enrico Chiavassa, EnricoGili, Fabio Predonzan, Giorgio C., Giuseppe Spairani, Ivan Gugole, Lonikon, Mamaroby, Massimo Coizzi Fotografia, Maxbonvi, Nilo Toria, StefanoConti, Vittorio Scatolini, Zman

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Giorgio Barozzi

sent on May 27, 2013 (16:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

HDR well done. Bello.

Caterina Bruzzone

sent on May 27, 2013 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Lovely view and good colors in the sky, the shadows seem too open at the bottom.
Hello.

Silvide

sent on May 27, 2013 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Catherine thanks for the ride of your judgment, and above all precious! ;-)
Greetings to you and George.
Hello :-)

Andrynoce

sent on May 27, 2013 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful soft colors, beautiful and also the reflection. One of the few hdr that I like.
Andrea

Massimo Coizzi Fotografia

sent on May 27, 2013 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful for compo and colors of the sky ;-)
But looking good seems to be divided into two parts .. or the first floor and 'almost grayish in BW and beautiful sky lite load ...
Maybe on the first floor the shadows very open and MDC you have played this effect.
Greetings

Silvide

sent on May 27, 2013 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the ride to Andrynoce and Integra. :-)
For Integra: surely you are right as I pointed out to Catherine, which is why I tried to recover by entering a HD with the necessary corrections.
If you want to give us a look I'd be happy to hear your opinions.
Greetings :-)

Nilo Toria

sent on May 28, 2013 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A beautiful HDR image and well-proportioned, let me only one thing: it was possible to change the angle to bring out more of the log? So it is parallel to the opposite bank and the second a little lost, maybe I say hogwash.

Silvide

sent on May 28, 2013 (9:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nile Hello, thanks for your visit.
See, my limit for this picture is due to a perspective that suffers especially the flare and APSC is in fact a 30 mm.
By this I mean that does not allow me to have angles with the sun in the room and with vanishing typical of a fisheye. : Fconfuso:
Or there's always the unknown of the compositional skills of those behind the viewfinder ..... ie myself! :-D
Hello ;-)

Nilo Toria

sent on May 28, 2013 (10:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I understand the problem even if you do not know the objective. Compositional skills come in force to try and comporre.Secondo me it is more important that you have "seen" this scene and he pulled out a nice picture, then when you have more than one optical performance will do even better.
Have a nice day.
ps try the Samyang 14, is cheap and even on aps going great, if you change then you have a true 14.

Silvide

sent on May 28, 2013 (10:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Welcome back! :-)
The optical change is in fact a project "forced", due to a recent shift in FF (D800).
On the D300 I thoroughly enjoyed his definition despite its limitations, but now it just is wrong.
I think the Nikon AFS 16-35 f / 4 as well as Sammy rightly that you suggested, but we'll talk about next year, the finances are ..... those that are! :-D
Hello and good day to you too! :-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.