JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 29, 2023 (14:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition is not the most functional since usually you should leave more air where the subject's attention is directed... But I understand that the particular window had to remain in the center. The dog with this underexposure lost detail and three-dimensionality, it was preferable to raise the iso and overexpose. Closing the aperture improved sharpness at the edges (observe the aerial area). Uncorrected distortions of the 17mm lens are very palatable. Good shooting point. (imho) Hi, Lauro La composizione non è tra le più funzionali dato che di solito si dovrebbe lasciare più aria dove l'attenzione del soggetto è rivolta... ma comprendo che la particolare finestra doveva rimanere al centro. Il cane con questa sottoesposizione ha perso dettaglio e tridimensionalità, era preferibile alzare gli iso e sovraesporre . Chiudendo il diaframma migliorava la nitidezza ai bordi (osservare la zona aerea). Sono molto palapabili le distorsioni dell'ottica a 17mm non corrette. Buono il punto di ripresa. (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on December 31, 2023 (9:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ellemme says:
“ The composition is not the most functional since usually you should leave more air where the subject's attention is directed... But I understand that the particular window had to remain in the center. The dog with this underexposure lost detail and three-dimensionality, it was preferable to raise the iso and overexpose. Closing the aperture improved sharpness at the edges (observe the aerial area). Uncorrected distortions of the 17mm lens are very palatable. Good shooting point. (imho) „
Thanks for the feedback, I'll keep them in mind for the next photos! Coradocon says:
“ Magnificent. Happy 2024 Corrado „
Thank you very much, happy holidays! Ellemme ha detto:
" La composizione non è tra le più funzionali dato che di solito si dovrebbe lasciare più aria dove l'attenzione del soggetto è rivolta... ma comprendo che la particolare finestra doveva rimanere al centro. Il cane con questa sottoesposizione ha perso dettaglio e tridimensionalità, era preferibile alzare gli iso e sovraesporre . Chiudendo il diaframma migliorava la nitidezza ai bordi (osservare la zona aerea). Sono molto palapabili le distorsioni dell'ottica a 17mm non corrette. Buono il punto di ripresa. (imho) "
Grazie per i feedback, li terrò a mente per le prossime foto!
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
