Eyes | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Portrait and Fashion

17.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Ritratti View gallery (14 photos)

Eyes sent on May 26, 2013 (1:12) by Whitefly. 4 comments, 610 views.

at 39mm, 1/15 f/5.0, ISO 1600, hand held.

View High Resolution 17.9 MP

8 persons like it: Bal, Boccio Mura, Diego.armando.parafango, Gpierocompostela, Photo Infinity, Quellolà, Raffaele82, Vittorio Scatolini

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Photo Infinity

sent on May 28, 2013 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Here too I find a compo, light and preparation Taken remarkable.
I suggest you invest ina a portrait lens, you have a remarkable potential, imho.
congratulations

Whitefly

sent on May 28, 2013 (23:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[IMG]I suggest you invest ina a portrait lens[/IMG]

The thing that surprised me, too, is to be able to click it at 2 in the morning, with a 18-135 and with only the light of a street lamp! I did not expect much in the success! Honestly I've seriously considered buying a lens suitable for portraits.
For now (come in mid-week) I took a 100 f2.8 Macro .... I love the macro and also with portraits, the 100 should behave definitely better than the 18-135!
We'll see the results in the future.
Lorenzo, Thanks for the compliment! I did not expect! You have advice for me on a goal even more powerful for portraits?
Waiting for news

Photo Infinity

sent on May 30, 2013 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ 100 should behave certainly better than 18-135 „

for sure

“ You have advice for me on an even more powerful lens for portraits „

for the moment, cut their teeth with the 100 macro, then the choices depend a little on many things.
For example, I am fine with the 200L 2.8 (cheap and it is fabulous), but if you want to be on the short ... Well the choices are reduced to 70-200, and the 50L to 85L.
Be aware though that the latter two are scalpel.
I have the 85 1.8 and I do not feel well at all (in fact I would sell). Others are extremely satisfied.
It 's all a bit subjective ...
the 70-200 use it for many other things, but the fixed ...
If you have quauks friend who has them, try them, thus avoid to leave a capital ...

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on August 01, 2013 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find it a beautiful portrait hello

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.