JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on November 13, 2023 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't know if you had margins for a less ambient shot (optical/focal length used?) however it would always be preferable to look for the parallelism between the sensor plane and the wing/body plane of the subject in such a way as to emitting the area included in the pdc avoiding that an area impales being blurred. (imho) Remember that if the subject was filmed in a controlled environment, as per the regulation, it must be indicated in the shooting data. (correct sentence: "subject taken in controlled amb.) more precisely in the "Caption" field that exists to add other annotations or any information you want to share about the photo. Check every photo you've posted so far and update. Thank you for your cooperation ;-) hello, Lauro Non so se si avevano margini per uno scatto meno ambientato (ottica/focale usate?) comunque sarebbe sempre preferibile cercare il parallelismo tra il piano sensore e il piano alare/corpicino del soggetto in modo tale da esendere la zona inclusa nella nella pdc evitando che una zona impalli esendo sfocata. (imho)
Ricordati che se il soggetto è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato, come da regolamento, si deve indicare nei dati di scatto. (frase corretta: " soggetto ripreso in amb.controllato ) più esattamente nel campo "Didascalia" che esiste per aggiungere altre annotazioni o qualsiasi informazione tu voglia condividere riguardo la foto. Controlla ogni foto da te postata finora ed esegui l'aggiornamento. Grazie per la collaborazione
sent on November 13, 2023 (23:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The shooting data is there And you were inside a butterfly house you weren't in captivity I dati di scatto ci sono E si era dentro una casa delle farfalle non era in cattivita'
sent on November 14, 2023 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In a "Butterfly House" also defined as a "Butterfly House" the subjects are in a controlled environment = In captivity - They can't go away so you have to update the caption as suggested and check the other shots posted ;-)
“ The shooting data are there „
They are not complete my question was: optics - focal length used? 8-) In una "Casa delle Farfalle" definita anche come "Butterfly House" i soggetti si trovano in un ambiente controllato = In cattività - Non possono allontanarsi quindi è da aggiornare la didascalia come suggerito e controllare gli altri scatti postati
" I dati di scatto ci sono" Non sono completi la mia domanda era infatti: ottica - focale usate?
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
