Martin in Ranthambore

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

Resize to fit window

India 2013 - Natura View gallery (19 photos)

Martin in Ranthambore sent on May 22, 2013 (21:58) by Ilfarna. 13 comments, 1692 views.

, 1/200 f/5.6, ISO 3200, hand held. Ranthambore National Park, India. Specie: Alcedo atthis

Ranthambore - Purtroppo scattata in condizioni di luce pessime

11 persons like it: Bepi, Cesare Brachetti, Francesco Abbate, Franco Giannattasio, Gpierocompostela, Laura Barchi, Mancini Massimo, Pm544, Quellolà, Raniero, Valeria Marchioni

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Bepi	sent on May 27, 2013 (17:48) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Nice, I like it, although I see a bit of noise hello

Ilfarna

sent on May 27, 2013 (17:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Bepi Hello, thanks for the ride. Indeed ISO 3200 for a 5DIII begin to be Tantini, and then they are a goat with the PP and reduced noise ;-)

Pallotta Luigi

sent on May 27, 2013 (19:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice

Ilfarna

sent on May 30, 2013 (18:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Luigi! never as your martino ;-)

Spanu Luigi

sent on September 10, 2013 (15:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful.

Enrico

sent on September 10, 2013 (15:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful ;-)

Mancini Massimo

sent on September 10, 2013 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful moment caught

Ilfarna

sent on September 11, 2013 (9:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks guys, I was a bit 'away and the sun was almost gone, so have a little high iso' penalized the detail ;-)

Franco Giannattasio

sent on September 11, 2013 (12:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great shot, nice capture! ;-):-P

Ilfarna

sent on September 12, 2013 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Franco!

Francesco Abbate

sent on December 18, 2013 (10:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

photo very nice and well set! congratulations! ;-) Greetings and happy holidays:-P francesco

Ollen

sent on December 18, 2013 (10:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The setting is very beautiful! ;-) ;-) You know everything is bad with light penalized and especially when it is necessary to increase the sensitivity of the sensor is a real tragedy, but in spite of all you can "bring home" a shot that otherwise you had to give up. In this case, the PP is crucial x does not aggravate the already precarious quality of the picture and it takes a lot of attention to detail on the parameters and corrections in a different way about shooting, in order to avoid the increase of the noise or remove too much losing even more details on the subject (see on the back of martin light) etcc .. In my opinion, having no source available to the shot but the shot analyzing and considering that the light was dim known that the white parts of the plumage are at the limit if not burned, it may be because of overexposureduring shooting but at the same time an increase in phase of PP for the rest a more than satisfactory considering the situation and parameters used ;-) hello In

Cesare Brachetti

sent on December 18, 2013 (17:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

excellent.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.