What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 22, 2013 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent :-) ottima |
| sent on May 22, 2013 (23:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! Doubt ... would have been better with the wings fully focus with this maf or that a little bit more dynamic and a feeling of depth? I closed the aperture but not enough, there is also a second insect intruder ;-) Grazie! Dubbio... sarebbe stato meglio con le ali completamente a fuoco o con questa maf che da un pó piú una sensazione dinamica e di profonditá? Ho chiuso il diaframma ma non abbastanza, c'é anche un secondo insetto intruso |
| sent on May 28, 2013 (9:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Considering the size of the picture I would say that the ideal would have been subject roost and completely sharp and in focus ... otherwise you should just focus on the subject or part of it ... They were not the ideal conditions to take a picture macro lens used for, shooting freehand and the ISO a bit 'too high ... the subject is beautiful, you know that butterfly is? Roberto. Considerando l'ampiezza della foto direi che l'ideale sarebbe stato avere posatoio e soggetto completamente nitidi e a fuoco... altrimenti avresti dovuto concentrarti solo sul soggetto o parte di esso... Non erano le condizioni ideali per scattare una foto macro, per obiettivo usato, lo scatto a mano libera e gli ISO un po' troppo alti... il soggetto è splendido, sai che farfalla è? Roberto. |
| sent on May 28, 2013 (12:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks ;-) Yes, that's what I thought, well I nitidezze on and focus but even so it's not bad seizing the moment, fortunately I replaced the 70-300 sigma (provided) with the Tamron 70-300 stabilized, it's another history! Travel is ideal. I do not know that throttle is, I can tell you, however, the place where it was taken, the reserve Perriyar in Kerala India. Hello Grazie Si, è quello che pensavo pure io su nitidezze e messa a fuoco però anche così non è male cogliendo l'attimo, per fortuna ho sostituito il 70-300 sigma (prestato) con il 70-300 Tamron stabilizzato, è tutta un'altra storia! da viaggio è l'ideale. Non so che farfalla sia, so dirti però il luogo in cui è stata scattata, la riserva Perriyar in Kerala India. Ciao |
| sent on December 31, 2014 (14:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
little nt ... poco nt... |
| sent on January 07, 2016 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The shot out from the usual for this type of insects do not mind, I think it is a butterfly:
Papilio polytes (female papilionide, with coloring that imitates the toxic species Pachliopta aristolochiae)
Both species are endemic to the region Indoaustraliana.
Hello. ;-) L'inquadratura fuori dai soliti schemi per questo tipo di insetti non mi dispiace, la farfalla credo sia una: Papilio polytes (femmina di papilionide, con colorazione che imita la specie tossica Pachliopta aristolochiae) Entrambe le specie, sono endemiche della regione Indoaustraliana. Ciao. |
| sent on January 07, 2016 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you ;-) Grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |