What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 04, 2023 (8:23) | This comment has been translated
Excellent shot, congratulations! |
| sent on October 04, 2023 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good shooting point and three-dimensionality. It was preferable to take more care of the composition since:-the framing hangs to the right-there are very strong falling lines For the 2nd point it would be preferable:- use a wider angle focal .. here 3mm were lost-correct in post production the falling lines knowing that you will lose something on the sides and proportions ... The greater the inclination of the digitalis the more falling lines will be .. - invest in a 2nd optic but super wide angle to be placed alongside the classic 18-55mm suitable for outdoor cityscapes (imho) Hello, Lauro Buoni il punto di ripresa e la tridimensionalità. Era preferibile curare di più la composizione dato che: -l'inquadrattura pende a destra -sono presenti delle linee cadenti molto spinte Per il 2° punto sarebbe preferibile: -usare una focale più grandangolare .. qui si sono persi 3mm -correggere in post produzione le linee cadenti sapendo che si perderà qualcosa ai lati e nelle proporzioni ... maggiore è l'inclinazione della digitale maggiori saranno le linee cadenti .. - investire in una 2a ottica ma supergrandangolare da affiancare alla classica 18-55mm indicata per paesaggi urbani esterni (imho) Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on October 04, 2023 (21:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lauro, Thank you very much for the valuable and technical suggestions :-) -In fact it hangs to the right, the geometry of the photo has not been changed compared to the shot, it had to be done. -For the falling lines I do not hide that I had noticed, tried to fix them in C1 but the result was bad, too closed in the center, perhaps because they are not only falling but lying just :-D -As for the optics I do not hide that I had a 12 / f2 in my backpack, but for laziness or haste to chase wife and children I did not use it. I try to post the version with the correct lines .. but I'm not convinced, it was better composed during the shot.

Ciao Lauro, Grazie mille dei preziosi e tecnici suggerimenti -In effetti pende a destra, la geometria della foto non è stata modificata rispetto allo scatto, andava fatto. -Per le linee cadenti non nascondo che me ne ero accorto, provato a sistemarle in C1 ma il risultato è stato pessimo, troppo chiuso al centro, forse perchè non sono solo cadenti ma stese proprio -Per quanto riguarda l'ottica non nascondo che avevo un 12/f2 nello zaino, ma per pigrizia o per fretta di rincorrere moglie e figli non l'ho usato. provo a postare la versione con le linee corrette.. ma non mi convince, andava composta meglio durante lo scatto.
 |
| sent on October 04, 2023 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The problem of fixed such as 12mm is that in certain locations they can complicate our lives because we have limited osatacoli in the operating area .. even using the feet-zoom. I think a used/guaranteed Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR could be perfect to complement the 18-55mm. One for interiors or urbex the 2nd for more breathy landscapes monetizing the 12mm There are other alternative optics but often floats the flare. Agree.. the correct version penalizes the scene (imho) Hello, Lauro Il problema dei fissi come ad esempio il 12mm è che in certe location possono complicarci la vita perchè abbiamo ostacoli limitativi nell'area operativa .. anche usando il piedi-zoom. Credo che un Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR usato/garantito potrebbe essere perfetto per affiancare il 18-55mm. Uno per interni o urbex il 2° per paesaggi più respirosi ovviamente monetizzando il 12mm Ci sono altre ottiche alternative ma spesse volte galleggia il flare. Concordo.. la versione corretta penalizza la scena (imho) Ciao, Lauro |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |