JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 01, 2023 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good maf. As a composition it was preferable to leave more space where the subject was facing. As an execution it would be preferable not to use the flash to avoid unnecessary stress-disturbance to the subject and secondarily for the result obtained. (imho). Hello, Lauro Buona la maf. Come composizione era preferibile lasciare più spazio dove il soggetto era rivolto. Come esecuzione sarebbe preferibile non usare il flash per evitare inutile stress-disturbo al soggetto e secondariamente per il risultato ottenuto. (imho) . Ciao, Lauro
sent on October 01, 2023 (15:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks specific that it was pitch dark, I did not use the flash but a flashlight fixed to the lens. It may be that nothing changes, that is, that the animal is still frightened, but I must say that according to what I saw it escaped when I turned off the torch and then I became visible. Thanks anyway for the information. Grazie specifico che era buio pesto, non ho usato il flash ma una torcia fissata all'obiettivo. Può darsi che non cambi nulla cioè che l'animale si spaventi ugualmente, però devo dire che secondo quanto ho visto è fuggito quando ho spento la torcia e quindi sono diventato visibile. Grazie comunque per le informazioni.
sent on October 01, 2023 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Torch or flash does not change Angel is always a disorder that especially in the period of the roar stresses these animals. In the moment that the light hits his eyes there is a disorientation, in the following seconds a crazy desire to get away from those who interfered in their passage but their vision does not return calibrated in 1 second :-| . On an ethical level, the nature photographer tries instead to cause the slightest disturbance camouflaging, reducing the shutter noise (softened / muted shot) ... so respecting the subject ;-) always (imho) Hello, Lauro Torcia o flash non cambia Angelo è sempre un disturbo che specie nel periodo del bramito stressa questi animali. Nel momento che la luce colpisce i suoi occhi c'è un disorientamento, nei secondi successivi una voglia matta di allontanarsi da chi ha interferito nel loro passaggio ma la loro vista non torna calibrata in 1 secondo . A livello etico il fotografo naturalista cerca invece di arrecare il minimo disturbo mimetizzandosi, riducendo il rumore dell'otturatore (scatto ammorbidito/silenziato) ... quindi rispettando il soggetto sempre (imho) Ciao, Lauro
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
. A livello etico il fotografo naturalista cerca invece di arrecare il minimo disturbo mimetizzandosi, riducendo il rumore dell'otturatore (scatto ammorbidito/silenziato) ... quindi rispettando il soggetto 