What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 01, 2023 (9:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent bn from film, beautiful interpretation of lights and shadows, a lot of grain, but with the Fomopan 200 there is, hello Ottimo bn da pellicola, bella l'interpretazione di luci ed ombre, molta grana , ma con le Fomopan 200 ci stà, ciao |
| sent on September 01, 2023 (9:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks della critica and for the visit. cheers grazie della critica e della visita. Ciao |
| sent on September 01, 2023 (11:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo has composition and yield in bw extraordinary. You have one of the few exposure viewfinders x very precise kiev. :-D I
like how he worked for gamma the film (I know it and it doesn't surprise me, for me it's great).
I don't know the development. Thanks to you I met and used the Thornton Two Bath Developer, but I don't know what you used. From the result it seemed to me more a Rodinal used with "energetic" overturning and not very uniform yield, as seen in the clouds.
However, the grain does not bother me, indeed (I often add it to digital), if that was the effect you wanted for development.
In summary I find the shot VERY well done, from the fascinating and magnetic result, from publication (and would make a great impression).
good!
La foto ha composizione e resa in bw straordinaria. Hai uno dei pochi mirini esposimetrici x kiev precisissimi. 
Mi piace come ha lavorato per gamma la pellicola (la conosco e non mi sorprende, per me è ottima).
Non conosco lo sviluppo. Grazie a te ho conosciuto e utilizzato il Thornton Two Bath Developer, ma questo che hai usato non lo conosco. Dal risultato mi sembrava più un Rodinal usato con ribaltamenti "energici" e dalla resa non molto uniforme, come si vede nelle nuvole.
Comunque a me la grana non dà fastidio, anzi (spesso la aggiungo al digitale), se quello era l'effetto che volevi per lo sviluppo.
In sintesi trovo lo scatto MOLTO ben fatto, dal risultato affascinante e magnetico, da pubblicazione (e farebbe un figurone).
Bravo!
|
| sent on September 01, 2023 (15:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Kenzo_jo
thank you ... before the Russia/Ukraine war broke out, I took different "strange" material (Tasma films etc) in a Russian shop. I also took this clone of the Ultrafine just to try ... And it worked well. Unfortunately, with the war it is no longer possible to buy in Russia. Not so much for the Ultrafine but more for films that are only there. @Kenzo_jo
grazie ... prima che scoppiasse la guerra Russia/Ucraìna, prendevo diverso materiale "strano" (pellicole Tasma etc) in un negozio russo. Presi anche questo clone dell'Ultrafine tanto per provare ... e funzionò bene. Purtroppo con la guerra non è più possibile acquistare in Russia. Non tanto per l'Ultrafine ma più che altro per pellicole che si trovano unicamente là. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
