What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 26, 2023 (5:51) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (10:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular!
Spettacolare!
|
| sent on July 26, 2023 (11:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful, nothing to say Stupenda, nulla da dire |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say a great result! :-or Direi un gran bel risultato!  |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (12:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Juza,
excuse the opening that you read above, f6.3 is the one obtained considering the multiplier? or should it be multiplied by 1.4x ?
Thank you!
Fantastic photo! Juza,
scusa l'apertura che si legge sopra, f6.3 è quella ottenuta considerando il moltiplicatore? o va moltiplica per 1.4x ?
grazie!
foto fantastica! |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (12:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comments!
f/6.3 is the real aperture, the most open available when using the TC 1.4x grazie per i commenti!
f/6.3 è il diaframma reale, il più aperto disponibile quando si usa il TC 1.4x |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How wonderful.
Greetings John Che meraviglia.
Un saluto Giovanni |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Forgive me the question, Juza... Why 1/16000? :-or Perdonami la domanda, Juza... come mai 1/16000? |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (13:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, I was also wondering why 1/16,000 with ISO 6400 and not 1/4000 with 1600.
Always to test the material?
Anyway I shoot very nice, works well I'm material Nikon. Già, anch'io mi chiedevo come mai 1/16.000 con 6400 ISO e non 1/4000 con 1600.
Sempre per testare il materiale?
Comunque scatto molto bello, lavora bene sto materiale Nikon. |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (14:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition.
Exemplary and background in perfect harmony.
Truly remarkable details,
light that gives magnificent colors
and three-dimensionality to the scene.
Chapeau Splendida composizione.
Esemplare e sfondo in perfetta armonia .
Dettagli davvero notevoli ,
luce che regala colori magnifici
e tridimensionalità alla scena .
Chapeau |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (15:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
perfect! perfetto! |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (16:23) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (16:32) | This comment has been translated
Very very nice! |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (20:05) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on July 26, 2023 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice catch!
Bella cattura!
|
| sent on July 27, 2023 (7:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the comments!
The shutter speed is for various reasons: previous photos with slower times had come micromoves, and apart from that I was in a situation where the light was constantly changing (clouds covering the sun, and then returning again in full light). So when in doubt I preferred to have a "too quick" time rather than one too slow :-) Grazie a tutti per i commenti!
Il tempo di scatto è per vari motivi: foto precedenti con tempi meno veloci erano venute micromosse, e a parte questo ero in una situazione in cui la luce cambiava continuamente (nuvole che coprivano il sole, per poi tornare di nuovo in luce piena). Quindi nel dubbio ho preferito avere un tempo "troppo rapido" piuttosto che uno troppo lento :-) |
| sent on July 27, 2023 (14:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot with a great detail. Bellissimo scatto con un ottimo dettaglio. |
| sent on January 11, 2024 (14:59) | This comment has been translated
Wow! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
