JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on July 06, 2023 (7:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The portrait is a bit unbalanced downwards and suffers from the cut to the subject. In case of recovery in a controlled situation, the rules of the forum provide for writing it. Il ritratto è un po' squilibrato verso il basso e risente del taglio al soggetto. In caso di ripresa in situazione controllata, il regolamento del forum prevede di scriverlo.
sent on July 06, 2023 (13:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good blurred and detail. Tips:- make sure not to cut parts of the subject (see his right paw) -take care of the composition (here there is little space below and in the direction where he is attentive) (imho) Remember that if the subject was filmed in a controlled environment or during a falconry show, as per regulation, it must be indicated in the shooting data. (correct sentence: " subject taken in amb.checked) more precisely in the "Caption" field that exists to add other annotations or any information you want to share about the photo. Check every photo you've posted so far and upgrade. Thanks for your collaboration Hello, Lauro Buoni lo sfocato e il dettaglio. Consigli: -accertarsi di non tagliere parti del soggetto (vedi sua zampetta destra) -curare la composizione (qui c'è poco spazio sotto e nella direzione dove lui è attenzionato) (imho)
Ricordati che se il soggetto è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato o durante uno spettacolo di falconeria, come da regolamento, si deve indicare nei dati di scatto. (frase corretta: " soggetto ripreso in amb.controllato ) più esattamente nel campo "Didascalia" che esiste per aggiungere altre annotazioni o qualsiasi informazione tu voglia condividere riguardo la foto. Controlla ogni foto da te postata finora ed esegui l'aggiornamento. Grazie per la collaborazione
sent on July 06, 2023 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok thank you. These are mainly first tests with the new canon r7 combined with the old 100 400. I wanted to evaluate the performance of the camera combined with a lens from 20 years ago. Ok grazie. Trattasi principalmente di primi test con la nuova canon r7 abbinato al vecchio 100 400. Volevo valutare le performance della camera abbinato a un'obiettivo di 20 anni fa.
sent on July 06, 2023 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Overall it seems to me a good yield, obviously on a recent 32Mpixel ff you will have to calmly evaluate whether to make a 2nd upgrade but reserved for optics with a more homogeneous yield between center and lens edge and whether to equip the digital with a Battery Grip to improve balance ;-) in order of price: 100-400mm rf - 100-400mm L is II :-) - 100-500mm rf ;-) (imho) Nel complesso mi sembra una buona resa, ovviamente su una recente ff da 32Mpixel dovrai con calma valutare se fare un 2° upgrade ma riservato all'ottica con una resa più omogenea tra centro e bordo lente e se dotare la digitale di un Battery Grip per migliorare i bilanciamenti in ordine di prezzo: 100-400mm rf - 100-400mm L is II - 100-500mm Rf (imho)
sent on July 06, 2023 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Point to 100 500 rf + 1.4. I'll wait again, let's see if prices drop a bit ;-) Punto al 100 500 rf + 1.4. Attendo ancora, vediamo se calano un po' i prezzi
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
- 100-500mm Rf