What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 17, 2013 (6:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice Molto bella |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (6:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bellino, stands out, however, hello Bellino, risalta però ciao |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (7:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot of a subject common to behold ;-) Bellissimo scatto di un soggetto comune a vedersi |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (8:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very good, very good. Ottima, bravissimo. |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (8:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-) |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (10:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all, I am comforted ... ;-) Grazie a tutti, mi confortate... |
| sent on May 17, 2013 (11:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent ottima |
| sent on May 19, 2013 (23:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful. bella. |
| sent on July 05, 2013 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The file is definitely good, since you asked me, I personally would have turned a hair more than the diaphragm, the dynamism of the subject was not affected, there is a slight difference in sharpness between the head and the body, assuming you did the maf on the head I would try the f / b dell'obiettico with many .... The difference is minimal and do a thorough post you can easily recover. If the maf is on the body then it is just better exploit the side AF points. In terms of image I warmed up the colors to mitigate the effect of "cold" triggered by the situation in the shade, a selective cleaning of the background and the undertail would improve the perception of noise. Of course the picture is excellent and makes the situation perfectly by scatto, my comments are aimed at a more visually intriguing. Maybe for a simple sparrow may not even be worth it, but if it was a rare subject .... maybe ... As I have written beyond the raw I do not download it here if you want send it to me by email, maybe even to this ... hello. You can use jumbo email .... Il file è decisamente buono, visto che me lo hai chiesto, personalmente avrei chiuso un pelo di più il diaframma, la dinamicità del soggetto non ne avrebbe risentito, c'è una leggera differenza di nitidezza tra la testa e il corpo, partendo dal presupposto che tu abbia fatto la maf sulla testa proverei il f/b dell'obiettico con il molti.... La differenza e minima e don un'accurata post si può facilmente recuperare. Se invece la maf è sul corpo allora si tratta solo di sfruttare meglio i punti laterali dell'af. A livello d'immagine avrei scaldato i colori per attenuare l'effetto "freddo" innescato dalla situazione in ombra, una pulizia selettiva dello sfondo e della parte sottocoda avrebbe migliorato la percezione del rumore. Beninteso l'immagine è ottima e rende perfettamente la situazione di scatto, le mie osservazioni sono rivolte ad un impatto visivo più intrigante. Magari per un semplice passerotto può anche non valerne la pena, ma se si trattava di un soggetto raro....magari... Come ti ho scritto di là il raw non mi si scarica, se ti và mandamelo per email, magari anche quello di questo...ciao. Puoi utilizzare jumbo email.... |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |