JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 245000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 23, 2023 (17:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems to me that the image is a bit inaccurate since the subject doesn't stand out that much in terms of sharpness. Personally I would have looked for a more careful maf on the center of the flower and then come to blur towards the outside of the petals where the pdc would probably have been missing. On a compositional level, I would have tried not to cut the petals, but I would have left more space towards the edges. Mi sembra che l'immagine pecchi un poco d'imprecisione dato che il soggetto non risalta più di tanto come nitidezza. Personalmente avrei cercato una più attenta maf sul centro del fiore per poi venire a sfocare verso l'esterno dei petali dove probabilmente la pdc sarebbe venuta a mancare. A livello compositivo avrei cercato di non tagliuzzare i petali, ma avrei lasciato più spazio verso i bordi.
sent on October 23, 2023 (17:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pigi47 I agree with your review, in fact I had also noticed the inaccuracy in the MAF. Unfortunately I was playing with a 105mm Micro and that means a lot of focus on the PDC. Maybe I could have solved all this with focus stacking, but that day I remember I had run out of time. Finally, on a compositional level, it was my will. Anyway thanks for the advice welcome and I hope you can intervene other times. A big hug Pigi47 sono d'accordo con la tua recensione ,in effetti anche io avevo notato l'imprecisione nella MAF. Purtroppo stavo giocando con un 105mm Micro e ciò comporta particolare attenzione sulla PDC. Tutto questo forse lo potevo risolvere con il focus stacking ma quel giorno mi ricordo avevo finito il mio tempo a disposizione. Infine a livello compositivo è stato un mio volere. Comunque grazie per i consigli ben accetti e spero tu possa intervenire altre volte. Un caro abbraccio
sent on June 05, 2024 (7:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The "blue daisy" is a Dimorphotheca. f/20 is exaggerated for a close-up of a hailflower flower; You could very well stay at f/11 and raise the shutter speed a little more. The photo is not too sharp, perhaps due to a blur. La "margherita blu" è una Dimorphotheca. f/20 è esagerato per una close-up di un fiore grandino; potevi benissimo restare a f/11 e alzare un po' di più il tempo di posa. La foto non è troppo nitida, forse per un micromosso.
sent on June 09, 2024 (16:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Paolo46 for your careful review. I appreciate the advice you've shared and gladly accept your feedback on the photo. Grazie Paolo46 per la tua attenta recensione.Apprezzo i consigli che hai condiviso e accetto volentieri il tuo feedback sulla foto.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
33.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
