Podarcis siculus | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Wildlife (no birds)

41.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

WILDLIFE View gallery (35 photos)

Podarcis siculus sent on April 29, 2023 (23:46) by Ennedue. 13 comments, 427 views.

at 190mm, 1/200 f/11.0, ISO 160, hand held.

View High Resolution 41.7 MP

7 persons like it: Albieri Sergio, Bo Larkeed, Gionskj, Lukeskywalker, Pigi47, Vsevolod K, Zeev

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Lukeskywalker

sent on April 30, 2023 (8:38) | This comment has been translated

Very nice!

Ennedue

sent on April 30, 2023 (10:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks Luke Sky walker.
by Obiwan Kenoby

Gionskj

sent on May 01, 2023 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful composition!
Congratulations
Gionskj

Ennedue

sent on May 01, 2023 (23:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Gionskj

Pigi47

sent on May 02, 2023 (10:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A good free hand obtained on a rather suspicious subject.

Ennedue

sent on May 02, 2023 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Pigi

Angelo_82

sent on May 18, 2023 (15:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think there is an error in the equipment used, these photos I do not think were taken with an r5 and their lenses ;-)

Ennedue

sent on May 18, 2023 (15:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

And yet it is just like that. R5 and Canon 70:200 lens.

Ennedue

sent on May 18, 2023 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Obviously with EF lens adapter

Ennedue

sent on May 18, 2023 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Now I have a Canon RF 100:500

Angelo_82

sent on May 18, 2023 (15:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well I will make sure there are no problems in the equipment then, the details are completely kneaded. Hello ;-)

Bo Larkeed

sent on December 01, 2023 (14:06) | This comment has been translated

Beautiful!

Ennedue

sent on December 01, 2023 (20:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Bo.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.