What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 17, 2023 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A simple homemade test on the fly with the X-T5 at ISO 12,800. The result seems good to me.
Reduced to 24 Mpixel to be able to upload it on Juza. Trivial post with DXO. Una semplice prova fatta in casa al volo con la X-T5 a 12.800 ISO. Il risultato mi sembra buono.
Ridotta a 24 Mpixel per poterla caricare su Juza. Post banalissima con DXO. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Trivial post but DXO is not trivial ... I
would say it's number 1 on Fuji and, I think, not only.
Of course he over 3200 I go there little but when you need the 40 mpx on APSC are those that Peter showed. :-o :-o Post banalissima ma DXO non è banalissimo...
Direi che è il numero 1 su Fuji e, credo, non solo.
Certo he oltre 3200 ci vado poco ma quando serve i 40 mpx su APSC sono quelli che Pierino ha mostrato. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice test Pierino.
It's been a week that I'm developing the raf of my xh2 with Silkypix pro and I have shelved for now DxO Photolab.
PL I find it better only in noise management, for the rest with Silkypix I find that the rafs have a very natural look or, if you want, more similar to those opened with the proprietary X Studio software. Bella prova Pierino.
É da una settimana che sto sviluppando i raf della mia xh2 con Silkypix pro e ho accantonato per ora DxO Photolab.
PL lo trovo migliore solo nella gestione del rumore, per il resto con Silkypix trovo che i raf abbiano un aspetto molto naturale o, se volete, più simile a quelli aperti col software proprietario X Studio. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Kelly15, thanks, you're right, DXO is not trivial but on noise reduction it is really powerful.
Alternatively, DeepPrime is either as a standalone program or as a LightRoom add-on.
@Mirko73, thank you. Try DXO DeepPrime XD for noise reduction. There is the trial and it's worth it. @Kelly15, grazie, hai ragione, DXO non è banale però sulla riduzione rumore è veramente potente.
In alternativa il DeepPrime o come programma standalone, oppure come add-on di LightRoom.
@Mirko73, grazie. Prova DXO DeepPrime XD per la riduzione rumore. C'è la trial e ne vale la pena. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pierino,.I tried it and it is valid, but I like Silkypix more for its naturalness in dealing with raf. Pierino,.l'ho provato ed é valido, ma Silkypix mi piace di più per la sua naturalezza nel trattare i raf. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
On that you are very right, I use DXO for noise especially. Su quello hai ragionissima, io uso DXO per il rumore soprattutto. |
| sent on April 17, 2023 (22:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For noise management DxO remains the benchmark Per la gestione del rumore DxO rimane il benchmark |
| sent on March 15, 2024 (16:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good composition.. !!! Una buona composizione .. !!! |
| sent on March 15, 2024 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Gio! I wanted to bring the machine close to its limits... :-) Grazie mille Gio! Ho voluto portare la macchina vicino ai suoi limiti...  |
| sent on March 16, 2024 (7:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't understand one thing, at least that's what happens to me... Amount the same raf...
first with Photolab and I assign it DeepPrime XD without changing the other parameters and export it in 16 bit TIFF
Then with PureRaw 3.9 and I leave the default settings (standard)
The results are different even if I apply the same algorithm.
PureRaw's is more effective in both detail and noise reduction. Non capisco una cosa, almeno a me succede così...importo lo stesso raf...
prima con Photolab e gli assegno DeepPrime XD senza variare gli altri parametri e lo esporto in TIFF 16 bit
Poi con PureRaw 3.9 e lascio le impostazioni di default (standard)
I risultati sono diversi pur applicando lo stesso algoritmo.
Quello di PureRaw é più efficace sia come dettaglio che come riduzione rumore. |
| sent on March 16, 2024 (7:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
From what I understand, Pureraw is always the first to use the latest algorithms.
For example, now there is the DeepPrime XD2, from what we read it is only present in Pureraw and not in Photolab. Da quello che capisco io, Pureraw è sempre il primo ad utilizzare gli algoritmi più recenti.
Per esempio adesso c'è il DeepPrime XD2, da quanto si legge è presente solo in Pureraw e non in Photolab. |
| sent on March 16, 2024 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, exactly, but I speak with the same version they give 2 different results. Si esatto, però io parlo a parità di versione danno 2 risultati diversi. |
| sent on March 16, 2024 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have to see if I still have the Pure RAW3 license and then I'll do a couple of tests too... I stopped using it a long time ago because in the end I was fine with doing the whole full post with Photolab, but honestly I never made comparisons. Devo vedere se ho ancora la licenza di Pure RAW3 e poi faccio un paio di prove anche io... Ho smesso di usarlo da tempo perché alla fine mi andava bene fare tutta la post completa con Photolab, però onestamente non ho mai fatto confronti. |
| sent on March 17, 2024 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Mirko, I've tried them and they come to me perfectly identical. I did one simple thing. I took the RAW and fed them to PureRAW 3 and I chose DeepPrime XD, same thing at Photolab, no posts of any kind, DeepPrime XD and so on... The output jpegs are absolutely identical. :-)
I'll give you an example.
https://i.postimg.cc/G3Bc5TZ3/temp-Image-VUr-Dzn.avif
https://i.postimg.cc/K4Xp9HCT/temp-Image-X28-W58.avif Ciao Mirko, ho provato e a me vengono perfettamente identiche. Ho fatto una cosa semplice. Ho preso i RAW e li ho dati in pasto a PureRAW 3 e ho scelto DeepPrime XD, stessa cosa da Photolab, nessuna post di nessun tipo, DeepPrime XD e via... I jpeg in output sono assolutamente identici.
Ti carico qua un esempio. Purtroppo devi cliccare sul link, perchè adesso postimages traduce i file in avif e non più in jpeg e quindi il tag IMG, per ora, non funziona...
i.postimg.cc/G3Bc5TZ3/temp-Image-VUr-Dzn.avif
i.postimg.cc/K4Xp9HCT/temp-Image-X28-W58.avif |
| sent on March 18, 2024 (0:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Piero! I uninstalled Photolab and reinstalled it and now it gives me the same result as with PureRaw 3...go figure out why it didn't work perfectly before!
I'm waiting for PureRaw 4 to come out for x+trans... I really find myself a wonder with Dxo! Grazie Piero! Ho disinstallato Photolab e reinstallato ed ora mi dà lo stesso risultato che con PureRaw 3...vai a capire perché non funzionava perfettamente prima!
Aspetto che esca PureRaw 4 per x+trans...mi trovo davvero una meraviglia con Dxo! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
