What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 04, 2023 (14:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't understand the contribution, can you explain? Non capisco il contributo, puoi spiegarti? |
| sent on April 04, 2023 (15:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ah great, then I understood. I simply hoped you hadn't come to comment on a stranger's photo, just to distribute free sufficiency. Of course I was wrong.
First, as anyone can read from the title, the photo is a forte crop of the previous one and slightly exceeds Full HD. Therefore it should be viewed without pixel peeping. In this way, I do not think the harsh criticisms you have gratuitously listed are detectable.
Secondly, it does not seem to me that the article referred to in the photo (if you have read it) has expressed a different intention than the mere test. Had it been a much rarer species than the Milanese parakeet pest, rather than no photo at all, a crop even so pushed would have represented a very pleasant document to collect in your gallery. Ah ottimo, allora avevo capito. Semplicemente speravo non fossi venuto a commentare la foto di uno sconosciuto, solo per distribuire libera sufficienza. Ovviamente mi sbagliavo.
In primo luogo, come chiunque può leggere dal titolo, la foto è un forte crop della precedente e supera di poco il Full HD. Pertanto va visionata senza pixel peeping. In questo modo, non credo siano rilevabili le asprissime critiche che hai gratuitamente elencato.
In secondo luogo, non mi sembra l'articolo cui fa riferimento la foto (se lo hai letto) abbia esternato una diversa intenzione rispetto al mero test. Con un briciolo di elasticità mentale, si può considerare che se si fosse trattato di una specie ben più rara dell'infestante parrocchetto milanese, piuttosto che nessuna foto, un crop anche così spinto avrebbe rappresentato un documento molto piacevole da collezionare nella propria galleria. |
| sent on April 04, 2023 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe if you used constructive criticism instead of derision, you would find someone who could accept it.
As far as I'm concerned, "Designed with Windows 98 Paint" nowhere would ever be mistaken for constructive criticism. Needless to try to sweeten it, you commented to ridicule my work.
Do you enter with a straight leg, without knowing me, without giving advice, alternatives, etc., just to ironize one of my photos, and am I the one who does not accept criticism? Look it takes talent to turn such a big omelette Magari se usassi critiche costruttive al posto della derisione, scopriresti qualcuno in grado di accettarle.
Per quanto mi riguarda, "Disegnato con Paint di Windows 98" da nessuna parte verrebbe mai scambiato per una critica costruttiva. Inutile provare a ritrattare, hai commentato per ridicolizzare il mio lavoro.
Entri a gamba tesa, senza conoscermi, senza dare consigli, alternative, etc, solo per ironizzare su una mia foto, e sono io quello che non accetta le critiche? Guarda che ci vuole talento a girare una frittata così grande |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
