What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 31, 2023 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Actually the lens is a TOMIOKA
Auto Revuenon 55mm 1.4
or at least it should be... 8-) In realtà la lente è un TOMIOKA
Auto Revuenon 55mm 1.4
o almeno dovrebbe essere... |
| sent on April 03, 2023 (15:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo of the flowering branch is not bad, it disturbs the view a bit that strong light on the upper left corner of the observer. If possible you should have tried not to let it enter the frame, perhaps moving a little or shading it or with a little patience modify it by drawing from other color sources overlapping them. La foto al ramo fiorito non è male, disturba un po' la visuale quella forte luce sull'angolo in alto alla sinistra di chi osserva. Se possibile avresti dovuto cercare di non farla entrare nell'inquadratura, magari spostandoti di poco oppure ombreggiarla o con un po' di pazienza modificarla attingendo da altre fonti di colore sovrapponendole. |
| sent on April 03, 2023 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Pigi, the shot was done manually and in a semi-backlit position, where a lens of over 60 years could not hold the flare even if closed by a stop, but still without the appropriate surface treatment. It goes into burn... I should have cloned the bleached part but I left it as it is. A lens, albeit of quality, derived from Tomioka feels the years and in my opinion it is right that imperfections are seen as such, they are part of the vintage character. Grazie Pigi, lo scatto è stato fatto in manuale e in una posizione di semi controluce, dove una lente di oltre 60 anni non poteva regge il flare seppur chiusa di uno stop, ma pur sempre sprovvista del trattamento superficiale adeguato. Va in bruciatura...avrei dovuto clonare la parte sbiancata ma l'ho lasciata così com'è. Una lente seppur di qualità, di derivazione Tomioka sente gli anni e secondo me è giusto che le imperfezioni si vedano come tali, sono parte del carattere vintage. |
| sent on May 22, 2023 (23:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
watercolors
... quoto pigi but the blurred spring colors are priceless acquerelli
... quoto pigi ma le cromie di primavera sfocate sono impagabili |
| sent on May 23, 2023 (1:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would have had to shield everything with a panel, or use a lens with a greater anti-glare capacity, but this one did not fit in. Vintage lenses often kick when direct light comes to them, shoot whites or water down all colors. I needed a hood properly and I would have solved. Vintage always with lenses sheltered Avrei dovuto schermare il tutto con un pannello, oppure usare una lente con una capacità anti riflesso maggiore, ma questa non ci stava dentro. Spesso le lenti vintage tirano calci quando gli arriva la luce diretta, sparano i bianchi oppure annacquano tutti i colori. Serviva un paraluce come si deve e avrei risolto. Vintage sempre con lenti al riparo |
| sent on May 23, 2023 (8:10) | This comment has been translated
 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
