JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Visto in una manifestazione di falconeria, inserirlo in animali domestici non mi pareva appropriato anche se non è stato ripreso in natura. Comunque uno splendido animale.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 06, 2013 (9:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sharpness I never know whether to load or not. Subcomandante you do not like the picture or the fact that it is in captivity? Or both:-D La nitidezza non so mai se caricarla o meno. Subcomandante non ti piace la foto o il fatto che sia in cattività? O entrambe le cose
sent on May 06, 2013 (14:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice the colors in the background, detail and composition in post-production. I was undecided because of the sharpness of the eye and not around it. The conclusion to be drawn is that the maf is anticipated (see area beak), 1/125sec are insufficient to counteract the movement of the eye but what was around the eye (eye ring) had to be sharp. Tips for next time: use a single point af-servant and composing already in the car. hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli le cromie sullo sfondo , il dettaglio e la composizione in post-produzione . Ero indeciso sul perchè della non nitidezza dell'occhio e intorno ad esso . La conlusione é che la maf sia anticipata (vedi zona becco) , 1/125sec sono insufficienti a contrastare il movimento dell'occhio ma comunque ciò che era intorno all'occhio (anello oculare) doveva essere nitido. Suggerimenti per la prossima volta: usa un solo punto af e ai-servo componendo giá in macchina. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on May 06, 2013 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. Wow arrive the advice of professionals in general, good. I used a single AF point but can not remember where it was targeted. I thought I was already safely with 1/125. Thanks for the valuable advice. Have a nice day. Ciao. Caspita arrivano i consigli dei professionisti del genere, bene. Ho usato un solo punto AF ma non ricordo dove fosse mirato. Pensavo di essere già in sicurezza con 1/125. Grazie dei preziosi consigli. Buona giornata.
sent on May 06, 2013 (14:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
1/125sec. are not of safety, but also if the eye had been perfectly still is the point of maf that is wrong result. Now you have to understand if it is a problem of FBF or if you were wrong you to drop the maf. hello and good light, laurel 1/125sec. non sono di sicurezza ma anche se l'occhio fosse stato perfettamente fermo è il punto di maf che è risultato sbagliato. Ora devi capire se è un problema di FBF o se hai sbagliato tu a far cadere la maf. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on January 16, 2019 (16:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think too much perfectionism fails the photos. you have to treat the composition and the subject and especially what you want to express. Then a little technique does not hurt. Secondo me troppo perfezionismo guasta le foto. Bisogna curare la composizione ed il soggetto e sopratutto cosa si vuole esprimere. Poi un poco di tecnica non guasta.