What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 12, 2023 (14:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot. I point out that this is the Colleoni chapel! :-D Bello scatto. Ti segnalo che questa è la cappella Colleoni ! |
| sent on February 12, 2023 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, and thank you for the clarification! Grazie, e grazie per la precisazione! |
| sent on February 12, 2023 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nothing excuse me if I took the liberty of reporting the typo Di nulla scusami se mi sono permesso di segnalarti il refuso |
| sent on February 12, 2023 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
May I ask how you feel about 14 35? I have ef 16 35 but with adapter ring and became quite bulky Posso chiederti come ti trovi con il 14 35? Io ho ef 16 35 ma con anello adattatore e diventato parecchio ingombrante |
| sent on February 12, 2023 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Imagine, I appreciated! Haha I also had the 16-35/4 before, and I changed it just for the bulk issue :-P
The RF version is much more compact, filterable screw without vignetting even at 14 mm, the autofocus is faster, has a very good RR for an ultrawide and the IQ is excellent ... Having to evaluate only the latter maybe the game is not worth the candle, but considering all the factors I was happy with the change! I had taken it on MW with the VAT discount of October, paid about 1300 Figurati, ho apprezzato! Haha anch'io avevo il 16-35/4 prima, e l'ho cambiato proprio per la questione ingombro 
La versione RF è molto più compatta, filtrabile a vite senza vignettatura anche a 14 mm, l'autofocus è più veloce, ha un RR buonissimo per un ultrawide e la QI è ottima... Dovendo valutare solo quest'ultima forse il gioco non vale la candela, ma considerando tutti i fattori sono stato contento del cambio! L'avevo preso su MW con lo sconto IVA di ottobre, pagato 1300 circa |
| sent on February 13, 2023 (8:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm reading a few reviews and who says it cartoons a lot and says that at 35mm it is not sharp. I use it little but I'm leaving for Venice and the focal ones are gold when space is scarce. For now I keep the 16-35 and I will keep an eye on some offers. I will sell the 16-35 hoping to tick off a good price. Thanks for the info. sto leggendo un po' di recensioni e chi dice che vignetta molto e che dice che a 35mm non è nitido. Io lo uso poco ma sono in partenza per venezia e quelle focali sono oro quando lo spazio scarseggia. Per ora mi tengo il 16-35 e terrò d'occhi qualche offerta. venderò il 16-35 sperando di spuntare un buon prezzo. Grazie per le info. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
36.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
