What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 23, 2024 (9:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad as a result with the tc 1.4 Non male come risultato con il tc 1.4 |
| sent on January 23, 2024 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's decent even if I have to say that the 100-400 is much better, the same goes for the 2 long zooms, the Tamron 150-500 and the Fuji 150-600.
Here the sharpness is not at the top and chromatic aberrations appear on the backlight. I have the same photo taken without TC, much better, but without the 70-300 it's quite short... E' discreta anche se devo dire che il 100-400 va decisamente meglio, stesso discorso per i 2 zoomoni lunghi, il Tamron 150-500 ed il Fuji 150-600.
Qua la nitidezza non è al top e sul controluce appaiono delle aberrazioni cromatiche. Ho la stessa foto fatta senza TC, decisamente meglio, però senza il 70-300 è piuttosto corto... |
| sent on January 23, 2024 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And yes, the 70-300 for birdlife is good only in parks where the animals are used to humans and allow themselves to be approached.... Otherwise it's too short E si il 70-300 per avifauna va bene solo nei parchi dove gli animali sono abituati all'uomo e si lasciano avvicinare…. Altrimenti è troppo corto |
| sent on January 23, 2024 (14:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That's how it is, in fact the 100-400, even the Sigma, represent for me the right compromise length/weight/cost... E' così, infatti il 100-400, anche il Sigma, rappresentano per me il giusto compromesso lunghezza/peso/costo… |
| sent on January 26, 2024 (16:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Today I ordered the tc 1.4 on Amazon and tomorrow I'll test with the 70-300 ... I'm very curious... I always read mixed opinions from the super enthusiastic to the not so happy one.... See Oggi ho ordinato su Amazon il tc 1.4 e domani farò le prove col 70-300 … sono molto curioso… leggo sempre opinioni contrastanti dal super entusiasta a quello non proprio contento …. Vedremo |
| sent on January 27, 2024 (5:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The truth lies somewhere in between, in my opinion, it doesn't have stellar performance with the TC, but it defends itself pretty well. La verità sta nel mezzo, secondo me, non ha prestazioni stellari con il TC, però si difende piuttosto bene. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
39.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
