What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 23, 2023 (19:20) | This comment has been translated
Very interesting! |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful compo and texture
Congratulations Daniele
Greetings
Mauro Splendida compo e texture
Complimenti Daniele
Saluti
Mauro |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, very interesting test, then show us the result!!!
Hello Si, molto interessante prova, facci vedere poi il risultato!!!
ciao |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (20:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
These tests are useful. I did not understand exactly the use, but maybe later you can exemplify bringing the practical results obtained Utili queste prove. Non ho compreso esattamente l'utilizzo, ma magari in seguito potrai esemplificare portando i risultati pratici ottenuti |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With living subjects I recommend the macro optical option from 90mm up with kenko dgx type extender (which would also maintain the af.
... So the third test is the one that falls within my ropes .
x Claudio: are shooting modes that can be chosen by the photographer to obtain that type of magnification the
only clarification is to know if the shooting distance (sensor-subject) has remained constant in all these tests.
Hello, Lauro Con soggetti viventi consiglio l'opzione ottica macro da 90mm in su con extender tipo kenko dgx (che manterrebbe anche l'af.
... quindi la terza prova è quella che rientra nelle mie corde .
x Claudio: sono modalità di ripresa che possono essere scelte dal fotografo per ottenere quel tipo di ingrandimento
l'unica puntualizzazione è sapere se la distanza di ripresa (sensore-soggetto) è rimasta costante in tutti questi test.
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very interesting, then show us the results! Molto interessante, mostraci poi i risultati! |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and interesting.
Congratulations Daniel ;-) Bella e interessante.
Complimenti Daniele  |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An excellent interesting contribution would also be to know how much space remains between paper and goal.
Un ottimo contributo interessante sarebbe conoscere anche quanto spazio rimane tra carta e obiettivo.
|
| sent on January 23, 2023 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There is always something to learn from those as good as you.... C'è sempre da imparare da quelli bravi come te.... |
| sent on January 23, 2023 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Giampaolo, Mauro, Bepi, Claudio, Lauro, Agata, Diodato and Fabio
Supergrazie for the very welcome visit!
The distance from the subject changes. I keep the focus at infinity only with 2 configurations: Sigma 105mm
alone and Sigma 105mm + Teleconverter (in
these 2 cases the photos in the table represent the maximum reproduction ratio I obtained)
In the case of tubes and inversion, the reproduction ratios are almost fixed: in short I can not photograph in full a subject larger than the millimeters you see in the table.
So the table is useful for me to choose the configuration with the largest usable playback ratio. Giampaolo, Mauro, Bepi, Claudio, Lauro, Agata, Diodato, Fabio e Benny
Supergrazie per la graditissima visita!
La distanza dal soggetto cambia.
Mantengo la messa a fuoco a infinito solo con 2 configurazioni:
Sigma 105mm da solo e Sigma 105mm + Teleconverter
(in questi 2 casi le foto in tabella rappresentano il rapporto di riproduzione massimo che ho ottenuto)
Nel caso invece di tubi e inversione, i rapporti di riproduzione sono quasi fissi: detto in breve non posso fotografare per intero un soggetto più grande dei millimetri che si vedono nella tabella.
Quindi la tabella mi è utile per scegliere la configurazione con il rapporto di riproduzione più grande utilizzabile.
Opinione personale... fino ad un RR di circa 2: la soluzione ottica macro + Teleconverter per me è la più comoda, mentre i tubi sono più economici. Oltre un RR di 2: l'inversione è d'obbligo. Ho provato anche il Sigma 105mm + Tubi + Teleconverter: non mi piace, soluzione lunga, con troppe giunte e poco rigida.
Un grande saluto a tutti |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (0:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not do macro but I find it interesting
compliments Non faccio macro ma la trovo interessante
complimenti |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (0:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interesting, excellent explanation of the technique used, hello. Interessante, ottima spiegazione della tecnica usata, ciao. |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (6:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interesting document of your work steps, but you should publish a little more often for us to appreciate the results! ;-)
Good day
Elizabeth Documento interessante delle tue fasi di lavoro, ma dovresti pubblicare un po' più spesso per farci apprezzare i risultati!
Buona giornata
Elisabetta |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (8:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It can be very useful, thanks for the explanation. Congratulations Daniel.
Hello Può essere molto utile, grazie della spiegazione. Complimenti Daniele.
Ciao |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (8:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This is a real passion for macros, bravo :-) questa è vera passione per le macro, bravo |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (9:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shooting and project very interesting, complinenti! :-)
Tim Scatto e progetto molto interessanti,complinenti!
Luca |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (11:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A very meticulous, accurate and very useful study. Great!!!!! :-)
A greeting....
Benny :-) Uno studio molto minuzioso, accurato e utilissimo. Bravissimo!!!!!
Un salutone....
Benny |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (16:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very interesting topic treated and well developed.
congratulations. Molto interessante l'argomento trattato e ben sviluppato.
Complimenti. |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (16:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent, good evening Corrado Magnifica, buona serata Corrado |
| sent on January 24, 2023 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A true scholar!
Good job Daniele Origgi!
Have a nice evening!
Fb Un vero studioso!
Buon lavoro Daniele Origgi!
Buona serata!
FB |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
