JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 30, 2013 (0:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Michi for the passage and comment if you like thank you in advance if you want to mark the "I Like".
Regarding your question: the PP in this shot is minimal, a conversion from RAW, a aggiustatina with the levels at points in black and white and a light intervention on the red channel. Then of course frame, signature and resizing for web. Can I ask what you thought it was "fake"? Grazie Michi per il passaggio e commento, se ti piace ti ringrazio anticipatamente se vorrai segnare il "Mi Piace!".
Per quanto riguarda la tua domanda: la PP in questo scatto è minima, una conversione dal RAW, un aggiustatina con i livelli ai punti di nero e bianco ed un leggero intervento sul canale del rosso. Poi ovviamente cornice, firma e ridimensionamento per web. Posso chiederti cosa pensavi fosse "finto"?
sent on April 30, 2013 (18:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Luke88
actually wondering why they are interested in the 100 mm canon (the one that you've used) and reading around, I got the idea that the focus (booke) was pretty tough. Instead of seeing the image I immediately noticed that the background is very nice and even. Then I wondered if I avessiti used the blur filter.
PS I did not think assoutamente that the background was fake, but I just wanted to know if the avessiti softened.
Your answer made me so happy, now I'm even more interested. You as you are with this goal? is suitable for portraits? I Daresi a general comment. (Your L is not it?) @Luke88
in realtà chiedevo perchè sono interessato al 100 mm canon (quello che hai usato tu) e leggendo in giro, mi sono fatto l'idea che lo sfuocato (booke) fosse piuttosto duro. Invece vedendo l'immagine ho subito notato che lo sfondo è molto bello e uniforme. Allora mi sono chiesto se non avessiti usato il filtro sfocatura.
P.S. non pensavo assoutamente che lo sfondo fosse finto, ma volevo solo sapere se l'avessiti ammorbidito.
La tua risposta mi ha reso proprio felice, adesso sono ancora più interessato. Tu come ti trovi con questo obbiettivo? è adatto ai ritratti? mi daresi un tuo parere generale. (il tuo è quello non L vero? )
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
