What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user1941 | sent on April 29, 2013 (16:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You were the stabilizer turned on? Avevi lo stabilizzatore acceso? |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
From what I deduce? I wish I knew hello Da cosa lo deduci? mi piacerebbe saperlo ciao |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella. Bella. |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (18:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and comment guys. @ Elephant Calf, the stabilizer must have it in his arms, because my 300 is the first version, so without. Grazie del passaggio e commento ragazzi. @Elefantino, lo stabilizzatore devo averlo nelle braccia, perché il mio 300 è la prima versione, quindi ne è privo. |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-) |
user1941 | sent on April 29, 2013 (19:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I must have the stabilizer arms, because my 300 is the first version, so it is free „ :-D I noticed it blurred the background a bit 'nervous, I thought it was the fault of the stabilizer. The 300/4 old is fantastic, sharper the new IS, I kept it for so long. " lo stabilizzatore devo averlo nelle braccia, perché il mio 300 è la prima versione, quindi ne è privo" Notavo lo sfocato dello sfondo un po' nervoso, pensavo fosse colpa dello stabilizzatore. Il 300/4 vecchio è fantastico, più nitido del nuovo IS, l'ho tenuto per tanto tanto tempo. |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Henry Thanks for the ride! @ Elephant Calf, this kind of blurred in part perhaps due to the proximity and contrast of foliage, in addition to the diaphragm and the use of the extender. I agree with you on the fact that it is a superb lens, with a price / performance ratio unmatched, the blurred in general are satisfied, although in this case I would have liked a softer, well for that there is a 2.8 . Thank you and hello. Grazie del passaggio Enrico!@Elefantino,questo tipo di sfocato in parte forse è dovuto alla vicinanza e contrasto del fogliame, oltre al diaframma e all'utilizzo dell'extender. Concordo con te sul fatto che sia una lente superlativa, con un rapporto prezzo/prestazioni senza eguali, dello sfocato in generale sono soddisfatto, anche se in questo caso anch'io l'avrei voluto più morbido, beh per quello c'è il 2.8. Grazie e ciao. |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (19:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful photo Una bella foto |
| sent on April 29, 2013 (19:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice compliments molto bella complimenti |
| sent on April 30, 2013 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Antonio and Luigi, very kind. Grazie mille Antonio e Luigi, molto gentili. |
| sent on April 30, 2013 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice wow! Molto bella |
| sent on April 30, 2013 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Maurizio. Grazie mille Maurizio. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |