What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 02, 2011 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too strong unsharp mask. In my opinion the picture was already clear and this disproportionate increase in sharpness was not necessary.
For the rest, good colors and the background. Troppo forte la maschera di contrasto. Secondo me la foto era già nitida e questo aumento esagerato di nitidezza non era necessario.
Per il resto buoni i colori e lo sfondo. |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (8:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Confirm what was said by Alvise72 add that it also causes noise in the background, anyway .... a pretty picture to be reviewed in PP. Confermo quanto detto da Alvise72, aggiungo che così si genera anche del rumore sullo sfondo, comunque.... è una bella immagine da rivedere in PP. |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (12:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comments!
In fact, I saw that I ran my hand fconfuso:
I tried to fix it, but I do not know how to put it back.
Grazie dei commenti!!!
In effetti ho visto che mi è scappata la mano 
Ho provato a sistemarla, ma non saprei come rimetterla.
|
| sent on October 03, 2011 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto sopra.postala again as soon as puoi.ciao Quoto sopra.postala di nuovo appena puoi.ciao |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But of course the original shares ;-) Do not apply the blur on this ... I know you probably do not need to say it, but I've seen people who did the original retail purchaser and was completely lost. I usually do so (photoshop CS4):
1. Duplico the level
2. I select the background with the magic wand (could serve cumulative multiple selections, hold down SHIFT)
3. Invert the selection (so it is selected only the subject)
4. I apply the MDC into two (or up to 3) passed on the selection (the only subject in fact), with parameters "soft" radius 0.4 value 50 (or even less), threshold 1 or 2.
5. I select the layer below (the original one that you have not applied the MDC) to apply a collapse disorder.
Sometimes runs his hand to me, but in general I get very satisfactory results. In addition, it works only if there is a strong detachment of sharpness between subject and background, and if the background is not excessivetively jagged. Trying is acquired then your technique and sensitivity. Però parti ovviamente dall'originale  non applicare il blur su questa... so che forse non serve dirlo, ma ho visto persone che lo facevano e il dettaglio originario era completamente perduto. Io di solito faccio così (photoshop CS4):
1. duplico il livello
2. seleziono lo sfondo con la bacchetta magica (potrebbero servire più selezioni cumulative, tenendo premuto SHIFT)
3. Inverto la selezione (così è selezionato solo il soggetto)
4. Applico la MDC in due (o massimo 3) passate sulla selezione (il solo soggetto appunto), con parametri "tenui": raggio 0,4 valore 50 (o anche meno), soglia 1 o 2.
5. Seleziono il livello sottostante (quello originario a cui non hai applicato la MDC) a applico un riduci disturbo.
A volte scappa la mano anche a me, ma in generale ottengo risultati molto soddisfacenti. Inoltre la cosa funziona solo se c'è un forte stacco di nitidezza fra soggetto e sfondo, e se lo sfondo non è eccessivamente frastagliato. Provando si acquisisce poi la propria tecnica e sensibilità. |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (18:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you again! in particular for the tip:-P Grazie ancora!! in particolare per la dritta |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto who goes before me on the post to be reviewed, I add that the subject is too central!
Rate the addition of an extender, in this case you could come in handy!
Hello
Fabio Quoto chi mi precede sulla postproduzione da rivedere, aggiungo che il soggetto è troppo centrale!
Valuta l'aggiunta di un extender, in questo caso ti poteva far comodo!
Ciao
Fabio |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (19:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good shot can be improved by a more careful PP. Un buon scatto migliorabile con una PP più attenta. |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Is it possible to put the image "right" ... at least I hope, in the same thread? C'è la possibilità di rimettere l'immagine "corretta" ...almeno spero, nello stesso thread? |
| sent on October 03, 2011 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree, for me the contrast is too intrusive and the subject too central. Consider purchasing a good 1.4x extender including third party such as the kenko pro 300 DGX. Yes, you can add a corrected version of the same tread or delete it but it will lose the comments.
Copy the string in Imageshack forums:
hello and good light, laurel Confermo, anche per me la mdc è troppo invadente e il soggetto troppo centrale. Valuta l'acquisto di un buon extender 1.4x anche di terze parti come il kenko pro 300 dgx. Si, puoi aggiungere una versione corretta nello stesso tread oppure cancellarlo ma così perderesti i commenti.
Copia la stringa forums in Imageshack :
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on October 04, 2011 (7:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So it should be better!
Così dovrebbe andare meglio?!
|
| sent on March 27, 2012 (22:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like .. Revised is even better, you can see the noise reduction even if the subject is slightly less sharp! Congratulations! Mi piace molto .. Riveduta è ancora meglio, si nota la riduzione del rumore anche se il soggetto è leggermente meno nitido !! Complimenti !! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
