JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 11, 2022 (3:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I ask out of ignorance: is the fact that the cat's bottom is so "soft" due to the lens or is it due to the depth of field, despite being at f11? Thank you Chiedo per ignoranza: il fatto che il sederino del gatto sia così "soft" é imputabile alla lente oppure é dovuto alla profondità di campo, nonostante sia ad f11? Grazie
sent on December 11, 2022 (7:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Sevenfightersuser. It is simply out of focus. At 240mm the pdc (at about 5m) is 14cm in front of the subject and 14cm behind the subject (in all they are 28cm). At 4m in all they are 18cm (9 in front and 9 behind). The point of focus is on the cat's nose. The cat's bottom is already slightly out of focus. Good day and thank you for visiting Ciao Sevenfightersuser. E' semplicemente fuori fuoco. A 240mm la pdc (a 5m circa, su ff e a f/11) è di 14cm davanti il soggetto e 14cm dietro il soggetto (in tutto sono 28cm). A 4m (f/11) in tutto sono 18cm (9 davanti e 9 dietro). Il punto di fuoco è sul nasino del gatto. Il sederino del gatto è già leggermente out of focus. Se guardi bene infatti ti accorgi che è fuori fuoco, e non è morbidezza della lente.
sent on December 11, 2022 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Natino. I wanted to ask you why I would really want to take this lens as an all-rounder and I was a bit confused by the various reviews over 100mm. Either I opt for the Tamron series (fixed plus 28-200 handymen and 70-300) or 24-240 Sony and a tele... And so I wanted to make sure there were no further softness problems. As much as you can ask a 10x all-rounder the lens seems to me at least valid, perhaps at a used price, but valid remains. Thank you Grazie Natino. Ho voluto chiederti perché vorrei proprio prendere questa lente come tuttofare ed ero un po' confuso dalle varie recensioni oltre i 100mm. O opto per la serie Tamron (fissi più 28-200 tuttofare e 70-300) oppure 24-240 Sony e un tele... E quindi volevo essere certo non ci fossero ulteriori problemi di morbidezza. Per quanto si possa richiedere a un 10x tuttofare la lente mi pare quantomeno valida, magari a prezzo da usato, ma valida rimane. grazie
sent on December 11, 2022 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Confirm. For me it is promoted. If you don't need the 24mm and settle for the 200mm the 28,-200 tamron is sharper. But you have to settle for a smaller focal range. And the used 24-240 you find it at much less than the 28-200. Confermo. Per me è promossa. Se non ti serve il 24mm e ti accontenti dei 200mm il 28,-200 tamron è più nitido. Ma ti devi accontentare di un range di focali più ridotto. E il 24-240 usato lo trovi a parecchio meno del 28-200.