What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 14, 2022 (23:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful image and composition! Congratulations, hello, Alessandro Bellissima immagine e composizione! Complimenti, ciao, Alessandro |
| sent on October 19, 2022 (21:25) | This comment has been translated
Congratulations, very nice |
| sent on June 30, 2023 (13:09) | This comment has been translated
Magnificent |
| sent on June 30, 2023 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful colors and great definition. Hello Corrado Bellissimi colori e grande definizione. Ciao Corrado |
| sent on June 30, 2023 (14:31) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on June 30, 2023 (15:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very well done... :-) ;-) molto ben realizzata... |
| sent on January 17, 2025 (18:12) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on January 17, 2025 (22:26) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on January 17, 2025 (23:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The effect of the water on the foreground is stunning. Nice shot. L'effetto dell'acqua sul primo piano è stupendo. Bello scatto. |
| sent on January 18, 2025 (11:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful Giampaolo nice pdr, details and colors.... but I wonder, given the use of the tripod, why at 400iso? hello Gianfranco bella Giampaolo bel pdr, dettagli e colori....ma mi chiedo, visto l'utilizzo del treppiede, perche a 400iso? ciao Gianfranco |
| sent on January 18, 2025 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ but I wonder, given the use of the tripod, why at 400iso? „ Ciao Gianfranco 1956 Let's see if I remember and let's reason... It was a late autumn afternoon, without sunshine. Keeping f11 (to have enough PDC for the foreground and background), if I had exposed at 200ISO the time would have doubled to 30 seconds and at 100ISO it would have become 1 minute. The GFX 50S-II with aperture priority automatically arrives at 30 seconds and no more; so to expose at 100ISO I would have had to use the B shutter speed but I didn't have the remote control. I also verified that (to my personal taste) very often the water is more beautiful and defined with times around 10-15 seconds, while at 1 minute it becomes too "velvety" and tends to hide the stones underneath. " ma mi chiedo, visto l'utilizzo del treppiede, perche a 400iso? " Ciao Gianfranco 1956 Vediamo se mi ricordo e ragioniamo... Era un tardo pomeriggio autunnale, senza sole. Mantenendo f11 (per avere una PDC sufficiente per il primo piano e lo sfondo), se avessi esposto a 200ISO il tempo sarebbe raddoppiato a 30 secondi e a 100ISO sarebbe diventato 1 minuto. La GFX 50S-II con priorità al diaframma arriva in automatico al tempo di 30 secondi e non oltre; così per esporre a 100ISO avrei dovuto usare il tempo B ma non avevo il telecomando. Inoltre ho verificato che (a mio gusto personale) molto spesso l'acqua risulta più bella e definita con tempi attorno ai 10-15 secondi, mentre a 1 minuto diventa troppo "vellutata" e tende a nascondere le pietre sottostanti. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |