What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 21, 2022 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) I know that look 8-)
Vs 28-85 a dream at the time of contax, how does it seem to you? I'm always tempted to look for one...  conosco quello sguardo
Vs 28-85 un sogno ai tempi delle contax, come ti sembra? Sono sempre tentato di cercarne uno... |
| sent on September 21, 2022 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Fabio, always very kind :-)
on 28 85 I entered very recently along with a contax st (which I will try as soon as I have a moment).
The goal is very large and weighs a lot. To understand us it has the front lens 82. So it's not very comfortable...
But the first impression about usability is very positive: easy to use. In defiance of 135 that I always do to tame, this "does what I want".
For the surrender it is too early, I want to see him better on the field. So far I have appreciated the evident contax plasticity and a good definition, but I have almost always used it on the long part of the focal length. I wait and see distortion on the short one (which according to the reviews there is, even if small) and operate in difficult light. POi I'll tell you....
Hello! Grazie Fabio, sempre molto gentile
il 28 85 mi è entrato da pochissimo insieme a una contax st (che proverò appena avrò un attimo).
L'obiettivo è molto grande e pesa non poco. Per capirci ha la lente frontale 82. Quindi non è comodissimo...
Ma la prima impressione sull'usabilità è molto positiva: facile da usare. A diffferenza del 135 che faccio sempre fartica a domare, questo "fa quello che voglio".
Per la resa è troppo presto, lo voglio vedere meglio sul campo. Fin qui ho apprezzato la plasticità contax evidente e una buona definizione, ma l'ho quasi sempre usato sulla parte lunga della focale. Aspetto e vedere distorsione su quella corta (che sencondo le recensioni c'è, anche se piccola) e operare in luce difficile. POi ti dirò....
ciao! |
| sent on September 21, 2022 (20:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks I'll wait... :-) about 135 I have recently the tessar for rollei and it seems promising. As soon as possible I will post some shots. The first impression is positive, especially the containment of the ac compared to the others I have (oly,nikkor,contax)
A greeting Grazie attenderò... a proposito di 135 io ho da poco il tessar per rollei e mi sembra promettente. Appena possibile posterò qualche scatto. La prima impressione è positiva, soprattutto il contenimento dell'ac rispetto agli altri che ho (oly,nikkor,contax)
Un saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
