JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 22, 2013 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The series is the one that I prefer. The colors are not too saturated and the houses are sufficiently legible. Remains present some digital noise and is perhaps the noticeable blur. Only if you also places the shooting data of the comments you might receive more complex and in-depth as well as some constructive suggestions ;-). Hello and good light, laurel Della serie è quella che più preferisco. I colori non sono troppo saturi e le abitazioni sono sufficientemente leggibili. Rimane presente un certo rumore digitale ed è forse avvertibile del micromosso. Solo se posti anche i dati di scatto potresti ricevere dei commenti più articolati e approfonditi oltre a qualche suggerimento costruttivo . Ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on April 22, 2013 (13:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for your suggestions, I am a beginner and take pictures with the automatic and frankly those few photos taken manually are very bad due to hear from Ti ringrazio per i tuoi suggerimenti, sono un principiante e scatto fotografie con l'automatico e sinceramente quelle poche foto fatte manualmente sono pessime grazie a risentirci
sent on April 22, 2013 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you use a DSLR or a bridge evolved test in the coming days to approcciarti like this: The program-imposed semi-automatic Aperture priority .. Up to you to decide the sharpness and depth of field -Set the iso to get a shutter speed of safety or long or short .. Always you decide, the camera interprets To avoid camera shake, during the day, try to set the default 200 or 400 iso ... varierai them if the shutter speed the judge insufficient. If whites or blacks are illegible shoot intervene on the deviation of exposure over or under exposing. I advise you to take and read 2 books: Abc-digital photography -Digital SLR photography both publishedby Cesco Ciapanna publisher
hello and good light, laurel Se usi una reflex o una bridge evoluta prova nei prossimi giorni ad approcciarti così: -imposti il programma semi-automatico priorità di diaframma ..sei tu che devi decidere la nitidezza e la profondità di campo -imposti gli iso per ottenere un tempo di scatto di sicurezza o lungo o breve ..sei sempre tu a decidere , la reflex interpreta Per evitare il mosso, durante il giorno, prova ad impostare di default 200 o 400 iso ... li varierai se il tempo di scatto lo giudicherai insufficiente. Se i bianchi sparano o i neri sono illeggibili intervieni sulla deviazione dell'esposizione sovra o sotto esponendo. Ti consiglio di prendere e leggere 2 manuali: -abc fotografia digitale -fotografia digitale reflex entrambi editi da Cesco Ciapanna editore
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
. 
