What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 27, 2022 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fabulous but at f22 you have a lot of diffraction, don't close below f11! Favolosa ma a f22 hai molta diffrazione, non chiudere al di sotto di f11! |
| sent on August 27, 2022 (16:15) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on August 27, 2022 (17:26) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful image |
| sent on August 27, 2022 (18:17) | This comment has been translated
Congratulations! |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (11:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Ingmaggiore: I don't understand... landscapes should not be made with a closed aperture?... using an f4 in landscapes is not a mistake?... I ask to understand... I have always been told that f16-f22 in landscapes is the target @Ingmaggiore: non capisco...i paesaggi non andrebbero fatti con diaframma chiuso?...usare un f4 nei paesaggi non è un errore?...chiedo per capire...a me hanno sempre detto che f16-f22 nei paesaggi è il target |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful image, with a natural rendering.
@Fabio: in theory, f8-11 would be the best to make the most of the sharpness of the lens; it goes up to f16 (not recommended beyond because diffraction appears) to optimize the compromise between good sharpness and maximum depth of field.
Hello, David Bella immagine, dalla resa naturale.
@Fabio: in teoria, f8-11 sarebbe il meglio per sfruttare al massimo la nitidezza della lente; si va fino a f16 (non consigliabile oltre perché compare diffrazione) per ottimizzare il compromesso fra buona nitidezza e massima profondità di campo.
Ciao, Davide |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (14:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you Davide for the explanation, so do you think in this shot there is a lot of diffraction?
Hello Fabio Ti ringrazio Davide per la spiegazione, quindi secondo te in questo scatto è presente molta diffrazione?
Ciao Fabio |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (15:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In this shot in my opinion the quality is very good, but I can't tell you how it would have come to f16 (exposure time aside, of course...). It should also be said that high-quality optics were used here.
I can tell you that with my "miserable" 16-35 f4 the difference between f16 and f22 can be seen!
Hello,David In questo scatto secondo me la qualità è molto buona, ma non so dirti come sarebbe venuto a f16 (tempo di esposizione a parte, chiaramente...). Va anche detto che qui è stata usata un'ottica di qualità elevata.
Posso dirti che con il mio "misero" 16-35 f4 la differenza tra f16 e f22 si vede eccome!
Ciao,
Davide |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (15:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Turbolumaca: thank you... because even for me the quality is very good ... for this reason I did not understand the comment of Ingmaggiore ... @Turbolumaca: ti ringrazio…perché anche per me la qualità è molto buona…per questo non capivo il commento di Ingmaggiore… |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (17:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank everyone for their speeches.
The construction, the weight (remarkable for a wide angle of this focal length) and the value are also high for the very low diffraction even at full aperture closure, a peculiarity of this "luxurious" lens. In this case, due to the effect of sea water, I was interested in raising the shutter speed as much as possible, otherwise for the depth of field a less decisive closure, like f11, would have been sufficient. :-) Ringrazio tutti per gli interventi.
La costruzione, il peso (notevole per un grandangolo di questa focale) e il valore sono elevati, oltre che per l'ottima qualità anche per la diffrazione ridottissima ulteriore peculiarità di questa lente. In questo caso, per ottenere l'effetto dell'acqua marina, mi interessava alzare il tempo di scatto il più possibile. Se fosse stato solo per la profondità di campo sarebbe stata sufficiente una chiusura meno decisa, tipo f11. Ecco la ragione della chiusura a F22 |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the explanation Alessandro, always on the piece!
Bye bye Grazie della spiegazione Alessandro, sempre sul pezzo!
Ciao ciao |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, congratulations!
Greetings Agatha ;-) Molto bella, complimenti!
Un saluto Agata |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (20:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I state that I like this shot and also a lot for colors and composition. What I still can not understand, on the basis of which criteria I read comments on shots, although pleasant to see, I read "extraordinary, enchanting etc." maybe just because it is a glamorous or naked or maybe you show off a self-supporting, where you clearly notice, that the maf you do not know where it was made. I state that mine is an observation by a pure layman and ignorant. Sorry for the remark, perhaps out of place, but it was just to understand.
I apologize to the author for having taken advantage of this space and I wish everyone good light
A sincere greeting
Mario Premetto che a me questo scatto piace e pure tanto per colori e composizione. Quello che non riesco ancora a capire, sulla base di quali criteri leggo commenti su degli scatti, se pur piacevoli da vedere, leggo "straordinario, incantevole ecc." magari solo perché si tratta di un glamour o nudo o magari si sfoggia un autoreggentenche, dove palesemente si nota, che la maf non si sa dove sia stata fatta. Premetto che la mia è un'osservazione da puro profano ed ignorante. Scusate l'osservazione, forse fuori luogo, ma era solo per capire.
Mi scuso con l'autore per avere approfittato di questo spazio ed auguro a tutti buona luce
Un sincero saluto
Mario |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful image!
congratulations!!!!
Oleg Splendida immagine!
Complimenti!!!!
Oleg |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it really beautiful, then I allow myself to attach
this link, to clarify the one already expressed by
davide-congratulations, of course I also served :-P
https://nisifilters.it/la-diffrazione-nella-fotografia-di-paesaggio/ La trovo veramente bella , poi mi permetto di allegare
questo link , per chiarire quello già espresso da davide-
complimenti , naturalmente mi è servito anche a me
nisifilters.it/la-diffrazione-nella-fotografia-di-paesaggio/ |
| sent on August 28, 2022 (23:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Also x me is a beautiful shot, a greeting
Mario Anche x me è una bellissima ripresa, un saluto
Mario |
| sent on September 06, 2022 (7:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it very much, beautiful exposure, beautiful light, very sharp .... of course the quality of the lens can make the difference, but alone it is not enough, I guess he did several tests and the best for effect on the water was this ... Beautiful!!
greetings
roby a me piace moltissimo, bella esposizione, bella luce, nitidissima....certo che la qualità della lente puo fare la differenza, ma da sola non basta, immagino abbia fatto diverse prove e la migliore per effetto sull'acqua sia stata questa...bellissima!!
saluti
roby |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
