What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 29, 2011 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Marco, the butterfly seems to me perfectly in focus, and the background is too present, but it is a very subjective view ;-) Ciao Marco, la farfalla non mi sembra perfettamente a fuoco, e lo sfondo è troppo presente, ma quest'ultima è una considerazione assolutamente soggettiva |
| sent on September 29, 2011 (14:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Luigi in toto! Quoto Luigi in toto! |
| sent on September 29, 2011 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Leaving aside the background, sometimes you can not do otherwise.
Wanting to improve as well as you will get a good maf, better treating the subject parallel focal plane. With the presence of highlights remember to compensate for the negative, especially if the subjects of these shades.
Leave a little 'space at the edges, so you can avoid giving a feeling of suffocation. Lasciando perdere lo sfondo, a volte non puoi far diversamente.
Volendo migliorare dovrai oltre ad ottenere una buona maf, curare maggiormente il parallelismo soggetto piano focale. Con la presenza di alte luci ricordati di compensare negativamente, sopratutto se i soggetti sono di queste tonalità.
Lascia un po' di spazio ai bordi, eviterai così di dare una sensazione di soffocamento. |
| sent on September 30, 2011 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all for the advice ... according to the software nikon the maf was the head of the butterfly maybe I should turn a little perk if nn I remember correctly I did or f3.5 or f5.6 ... ke you say?? grazie a tutti per i consigli... secondo il software nikon la maf era sulla testa della farfalla forse avrei dovuto chiudere un po perke se nn mi ricordo male l'ho fatta o a f3.5 o a f5.6 ...voi ke dite ??? |
| sent on September 30, 2011 (17:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shooting data are correct: 100 iso. f.5, 6 105mm 1/500sec.
You have chosen a shooting 3/4 front rather than search for a perfect parallelism between the sensor plane and the subject. Do not be a requirement to look for him, only that the depth of field in macro is played for a handful of millimeters and some f.5, 6 is not a happy choice. As personal interpretation then I raised the ISO to 400 (no more) and more closed the aperture, the focus would have made manually. You have not said if you've done freehand or with tripod (I guess freehand). You can always enter, next to the title, the full details of the shooting? ? These provide useful information to other users allows them to enter into the spirit of better picture posted and understand your options in the stage of pre-release as well as allow us to make a more reasoned and objective comment. hello and good light, laurel I dati di scatto esatti sono: 100 iso. f.5,6 105mm 1/500sec.
Hai scelto una ripresa a 3/4 frontale anziché ricercare un perfetto parallelismo tra il piano sensore e il soggetto. Non che sia obbligatorio cercarlo, solo che la profondità di campo in macro si gioca per un pugno di millimetri e certo f.5,6 non è stata una scelta felice. Come interpretazione personale avrei quindi alzato gli iso a 400 (non di più) e chiuso maggiormente il diaframma , la messa a fuoco l'avrei fatta manualmente. Non hai dichiarato se hai fatto a mano libera o con treppiede (immagino a mano libera). Puoi inserire sempre, a fianco del titolo, i dati completi di scatto? ? Fornire questi elementi utili agli altri utenti permette loro di entrare meglio nello spirito della fotografia postata e comprendere le tue scelte nella fase del pre-scatto oltre a permetterci di fare un commento più ragionato e oggettivo. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on October 01, 2011 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much for your advice in the future I will try to put the shooting data cmq is the photo has been made by hand, hello grazie mille per il consiglio in futuro cerchero di mettere i dati di scatto cmq si la foto e stata fatta a mano libera , ciao |
| sent on October 05, 2011 (21:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice for the photo you have already explained everything. I'll wait for a photographic output. See you soon.
Antonino Bello, per la foto ti hanno già spiegato tutto. Ti aspetto per un uscita fotografica. A presto.
Antonino |
| sent on October 08, 2011 (14:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok good I am at your disposal. mark ok bello io sono a disposizione . marco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
