RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Val Taleggio...

Paesaggi

View gallery (21 photos)

Val Taleggio sent on April 17, 2013 (22:26) by Multicolor. 9 comments, 1197 views. [retina]

at 10mm, 1/5 f/16.0, ISO 100, tripod. Sorgenti torrente Enna, Italy.

Il torrente Enna, l'inquilino della Valle Taleggio (BG). Qui mi trovavo alla fine dell'orrido dove la piccola Val Taleggio si tuffa nella Valle Brembana.



View High Resolution 17.9 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on April 17, 2013 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

First experiment of shooting a stream, I'd like to get some advice or inspiration, especially on exposure to make the water.

Mattia

avatarsupporter
sent on April 18, 2013 (8:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello hips are starting out with this type of photo, the only thing that I can say, and 'use a filter type b + w that increases the stop. and makes the water effect with even more 'silky
The photo and 'very nice
hello :-)

avatarsenior
sent on April 18, 2013 (8:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You have to use at least one filter that is blocking you ND16 4 stop of light. With these filters, you would have made this beautiful photo that is already very beautiful. Hello. 8-)

avatarjunior
sent on April 18, 2013 (9:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What Toquinho is good advice, the photo is well composed and the dynamism of the water I do not mind just as it is. Do you happen to use a polarizer? Sometimes just his second stop for the pleasing effects on the water

avatarjunior
sent on April 18, 2013 (11:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

According to me the choice of the time is correct: a longer time (obtained with abundant ND filter) would yes made more silky water but the second would of limited against that sense of energy so that it transmits.

avatarjunior
sent on April 18, 2013 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to all the advice, what I can say for now is that I have also tried to further close the diaphragm and to the long time, says tiraboschi with a time longer than the water lost energy and I preferred this, partly because to f22 quality is worst.
The trip was made without any filter, most certainly I will take forward a polarizer, calculated that the sigma 10-20 3.5 mounted filters with a diameter of 82 mm then costosetti.

Mattia

avatarsenior
sent on May 26, 2013 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Fundamental polarizer .... I agree NOT to use absolutely ... nd filters tend to give a feeling of tranquility to the scene .... and energy, as in reality definitely a situation .... I sent the photo beautiful and to advise on the composition I should be on location ...

avatarjunior
sent on May 27, 2013 (15:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Angus Thanks for the comment, I must say that I think the composition is evaluated by the click, not the location, I understand that some locations may be suggestive and the recovery may be flat, but sometimes some of the reverse happens, as far as I think this photo that the composition reflects what I wanted to enclose, or the force of the water that has shaped the rock and the constant flow.
In any case, if ever passassi by the parties of the Taleggio Valley I would be happy to accompagnartici!

Mattia

avatarsenior
sent on May 29, 2013 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sacrosanct what you say .... what I mean is that sometimes some improvements to the composition are not feasible because of its location ... is that the case in which we squeezed to the bottom of the landscape that we face. For example, in this case I would try not to include the boulder in the left ..... but maybe it was not possible without sacrificing something more important. Being on the spot ... only I could see. Anyway .. the shot is very beautiful and picturesque location ... so thanks for the invitation ... if I can arrange sfrutterò your hospitality!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me