What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user579 | sent on April 15, 2013 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very well!
Ben shot, with good sharpness and exposure maf and perfect!
With a bit of post targeted can improve a lot!.
A word of advice, leave sti 200 iso closing at f / 8 in order to gain clarity, risk of hitting times too low to freeze the animals. In this case, the blur is only on the wings and earns dynamism to shoot, in other cases people even faster risks of having a blurred picture. Consider that to 400ISO the qualitative difference compared to 200iso is almost nothing ;-) ;-) but with the times doubled. In this case you would have taken at 1/500s, the other the night heron (which if I remember correctly was turning and I think it's move) 1/640s....che are already borderline time to freeze a bird in flight; -) so do not be afraid, the better a hair dthe noise that a shot to trash ;-) Molto bene!
Ben ripresa, con nitidezza buona e maf ed esposizione perfette!
Con un pò di post mirata può migliorare molto!.
Un consiglio, abbandona sti 200 iso; chiudendo a f/8 per guadagnare nitidezza, rischi di incappare in tempi troppo bassi per congelare gli animali. In questo caso il mosso è solo sulle ali e fa guadagnare dinamismo allo scatto, in altri casi con soggetti magari più veloci rischi di avere una foto mossa. Considera che a 400iso la differenza qualitativa rispetto ai 200iso è pressochè nulla  ma con i tempi raddoppiati. In questo caso avresti scattato a 1/500s, nell'altra della nitticora (che se non ricordo male era in virata e secondo me è mossa) 1/640s....che sono già tempi border line per congelare un volatile in volo quindi non aver paura, meglio un pelo di rumore che uno scatto da cestinare |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, please Angelino ... Well unfortunately they were already promissimi the shots we took and I was still at 200 iso, then I followed your advice and I am risen to 400, but in the end my best shots were, however, and unfortunately these were not appropriate speeds: fconfuso:
Now keep well in my mind to use an iso x Po highest gain in a short time ;-) Si grazie Angelino... Eh gia purtroppo erano i promissimi scatti che abbiamo fatto ed ero ancora a 200 iso, poi ho seguito il tuo consiglio e son salito a 400 ma alla fine i mie scatti migliori erano comunque questi e purtroppo non erano a velocità adeguate 
Adesso terrò ben impresso nella mente di usare iso un Po più alti x guadagnare in tempi rapidi |
user579 | sent on April 15, 2013 (17:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In addition, you should perform a small test at home.
Test on tripod: head at various distances from the subject (perhaps a test on nearby objects and one for distant objects) your optical @ 300mm at various apertures and then compare. Surely between f/5.6 and f / 8 or f / 9 there is much difference. Perhaps, however, between f/7.1 and f / 8, the difference will be minimal, this is to say that if you miss a juncture "speed" you know that shooting at 7.1 instead of 8 quality will be acceptable and earn the third stop of speed maybe you can help. Knowing your equipment thoroughly by testing home helps us later in the field to solve technical problems. And check out the speech micro, if you need then call me or write me in private ;-) Inoltre ti consiglio di effettuare un piccolo test casalingo.
Prova su tripod: testa a varie distanze dal soggetto (magari un test su oggetti vicini e uno su oggetti lontani) la tua ottica @300mm a vari diaframmi e poi confronta. Sicuramente tra f/5.6 e f/8 o f/9 c'è molta differenza. Magari però tra f/7.1 e f/8 la differenza sarà minima; questo per dire che se in un frangente ti manca "velocità" sai che scattando a 7.1 anzichè 8 la qualità sarà comunque accettabile e guadagnerai quel 1/3 di stop di velocità che magari ti può dare una mano. Conoscere la propria attrezzatura a fondo facendo test casalinghi ci aiuta poi sul campo a risolvere i problemi tecnici. E prova anche il discorso microregolazione, se hai bisogno poi mi telefoni o mi scrivi in privato |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (18:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful capture
hello Bella cattura
ciao |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (20:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
d 'agreement with Angelino84, all your shots except maybe that moved.
Maybe it's better to shoot at F 5.6 with a party but 'not moved.
For subjects in the flight as I set these at least from 1/000 up.
Another side note, when you look at the post-contrast, and saturation (storks and 'white duck years completely burnt and are too saturated).
Hello d' accordo con Angelino84, tutti i tuoi scatti tranne forse questo sono mossi.
Forse è meglio scattare a F 5,6 con un soggetto pero' non mosso.
Per soggetti in volo come questi io imposto almeno dal 1/000 in su.
Altra piccola nota, quando fai postproduzione occhio al contrasto e alla saturazione (le cicogne e l' anatra anno bianchi totalmente bruciati e sono troppo sature).
Ciao |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful capture bella cattura |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (20:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
catturawow excellent! ottima cattura |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (21:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good catch. Ottima cattura. |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-) ;-) |
| sent on April 15, 2013 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ben shooting. Ben ripresa. |
| sent on April 16, 2013 (23:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all:-P Grazie a tutti  |
| sent on April 17, 2013 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Capture in flight very nice, beautiful subject. ;-):-P Cattura in volo molto bello, splendido il soggetto. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
