Common squirrel | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Wildlife (no birds)

8.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Animali View gallery (8 photos)

Common squirrel sent on March 30, 2022 (12:33) by Danilo Poetto. 2 comments, 118 views.

at 400mm, 1/1000 f/6.3, ISO 3200, hand held.

View High Resolution 8.0 MP

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on March 30, 2022 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good composition.
To review and optimize the future approach.
Tips:
- disable the automatic settings of iso
- opt for only 1 point af
- af to tracking
- priority of aperture
Deepening:
-the variables are always 4 ... time - aperture - iso and deviation of
exposure-setting aperture priority we are the ones to decide the pdc, the blurred and the
sharpness-if the shutter speed is borderline we will act on the iso (from time to time) but without exaggerating-here
the squirrel is overexposed and with burned areas reason more to take advantage of the deviation of the exposure ... here perhaps it was enough to underexpose 2/3 stop.
(imho)
Hello, Lauro

Danilo Poetto

sent on March 30, 2022 (14:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the information... I will try in the next few days.
Hello Danilo

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.