Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Wildlife (no birds)

18.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Fauna (no uccelli) View gallery (27 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on March 25, 2022 (22:56) by Eight_wonder. 7 comments, 130 views.

at 600mm, 1/160 f/6.3, ISO 500, hand held.

View High Resolution 18.0 MP

3 persons like it: Epago, Stearm, Zanardo

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on March 27, 2022 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find the colors, the blurred and the composition pleasant.
The focus is postponed, had only one af point been set and af continuous?
At the pre-shot level it was preferable to raise the iso and close the aperture to increase the depth of field (three-dimensional subject).
It is advisable to apply a fine Microregulation of af
https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=209582
(imho)
Hello, Lauro

Eight_wonder

sent on March 27, 2022 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If I raise the iso I get excessive noise, I have already done some tests. I have these problems only with the sigma and the D810, it should be calibrated but I am not capable of it.

Elleemme

sent on March 27, 2022 (20:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If you follow the link above you will find the practical and economical solution to perform the BFFocus test and with a small expense you can apply microregulation through the SLR.
You could attenuate the digital noise by exploiting the 4th variable of a shot: the deviation of the exposure (key +/-)
"the other 3 variables are obviously: time-iso-diaphragm".
On the practical side it would be enough to subexpose a hair (eg +0.333 or 0.666) and underexpose in post production
which is different from underexposing in the pre-shot and then overexposing in the post shot.

Eight_wonder

sent on March 27, 2022 (21:01) | This comment has been translated

Thanks a lot!

Jerry Vacchieri

sent on March 28, 2022 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

a nice shot set apart from the problem of fire .... :-)

I see that even the shutter speed is not very high....

Stearm

sent on March 28, 2022 (11:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful portrait in beautiful setting Congratulations ;-)

Eight_wonder

sent on April 02, 2022 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to Lauro's advice I should have solved the problem, I'm sorry to have wasted such an opportunity it is difficult to get so close. I'll try again 8-) :-D

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.