RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Walk on the Lake...

Paesaggi

View gallery (12 photos)

Walk on the Lake sent on March 20, 2022 (21:54) by Lynn95. 18 comments, 1036 views. [retina]

, 1/125 f/5.6, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 21.9 MP  

3 persons like it: Fabio F77, RobertoTR, Telmo_Berlenga


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2022 (5:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Comment here as per forum rules starting from your request in the post you opened "What's wrong with this photo". My opinion:
- missing a subject
- missing the composition
- missing a reading of the light that gives meaning to the first two points
- unrealistic lights and contrasts (wrong post production)
Probably a photo to be trashed.

avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2022 (12:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

in my opinion the problem arises from the moment of shooting. I believe that the time, and consequently the light, is not very suitable. in this case I would have tried to expose for the shadows, then overexposing but without burning the lights, and then in post I would have tried to balance the exposure of the whole photo bringing the exposure to an ideal level.

avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2022 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not remember who in a comment spoke of hdr, in my opinion he said well. I also believe that in this case you would have obtained a much better result.

avatarjunior
sent on March 21, 2022 (22:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with you, the comparison with those who have more experience always benefits.
The photo was taken during a Sunday walk, I admit to have immortalized it too late because the sun was already beyond the mountain, and the result is seen from the light and dark too marked, making it a non-optimal photo both basic and also processing it. If the same situation had happened 30 minutes earlier maybe it would have been another photo.
I leave you here the RAW, maybe someone wants to have fun postprodorla and maybe post the result, which I and there can be useful for educational purposes.

https://ufile.io/frxtswpq

avatarjunior
sent on March 22, 2022 (5:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion what does not convince and does not allow to enhance the photo is the position of the subject with respect to the background. Maybe there are all the elements but they do not combine together. I would tell you that the point of recovery does not go, but we should have been there.

avatarjunior
sent on March 22, 2022 (10:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think I have followed the basic rules of composition, then you are more experienced than me you will be able to tell me better. Reselling it days apart what I criticize is the lack of a light area on the beach around the subject, in order to give more re-elevation

avatarsenior
sent on March 22, 2022 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

what I criticize is the lack of a light area on the beach around the subject, in order to give more re-elevation

also in my opinion. I reiterate that in my opinion it would be to be exposed for the shadows and then repaired in post.

avatarsenior
sent on March 22, 2022 (12:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion what does not convince and does not allow to enhance the photo is the position of the subject with respect to the background. Maybe there are all the elements but they do not combine together. I would tell you that the point of recovery does not go, but we should have been there.

That's right, the human figure stands out against the only stretch of dark sea like the figure that is therefore almost invisible.
I think it's difficult to recover it in post, something had to change in the recovery phase but I don't know if it was possible

avatarsenior
sent on March 22, 2022 (13:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

is it your Voodoo idea or is it just like that?

avatarsenior
sent on March 22, 2022 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Clearly it is my idea, based on the photo posted.
Seeing the raw instead the situation may be less worse than expected

avatarsenior
sent on March 22, 2022 (14:55) | This comment has been translated

;-)

avatarjunior
sent on March 22, 2022 (21:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'll try, the problem is that recovering the shadows is always a critical option... Taking it sportingly, if there are no improvements doing what you have suggested, I will trash the photo ... On the other hand, the basket is the photographer's best friend, isn't it? :-D

avatarjunior
sent on March 22, 2022 (22:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I tried to expose for the shadows and use masks to remove the mist and homogenize the light. I'm not saying it's the definite photo, but I think it's better than the one I posted.
https://we.tl/t-D7aCIDLkJP

avatarsenior
sent on March 23, 2022 (8:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

maybe I explained myself wrong. expose for the shadows during shooting, not then in post !

avatarsupporter
sent on March 23, 2022 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In fact, the incongruity between the sky and the coast is obvious; the right part of the image is excessively underexposed, such as to make the details almost illegible and the human figure, which should be the focal point of the image, is very little visible; I also believe that a shot in hdr would have been appropriate .

avatarjunior
sent on March 25, 2022 (1:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Okay, it is clear that there were mistakes on my part in the choice of light, it is clear that this is a photo to be trashed, but I was pleased that it was commented by you who were able to explain the mistakes made.
It was a very useful discussion that made me learn new things.
Thank you all and good light!!! 8-)

avatarsupporter
sent on March 25, 2022 (7:04) | This comment has been translated

Sorriso;-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 25, 2022 (16:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you have been able to explain to me the mistakes made.
I would like to preface that I am not able to tell you if and what mistake you have made, I am not a professor and I am no one to say what is wrong and where. but in my opinion, the important thing is not to never make mistakes, it is important instead to know what is wrong so as not to repeat the same mistake again.
returning to the photo, if you had used the ettr "maybe" you would have obtained a better result. when the difference between the shadows and the highlights is remarkable it is a technique that I use often.




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me