JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on November 26, 2011 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good point shot and composition. This for me was giving more room for improvement in the air and on the left, avoiding the cutting of the mustache and legs. Setting extremist (in the good sense of the term) defends the use of photograph always at room temperature with optical light for close-ups but gets punched in the practical and aesthetic discourse. To clarify better if the subject had been with his eyes front of you emphasize the blurring taking at room temperature and with a maf surgery you would have shown both eyes and exploit the supersfocato other parts of the cat. In one shot diagonal (example 3/4) the maf must instead be superchirurgica involving both eyes of the subject ... following this rule the experience you would bring to a close at least f.4. If you look at the image you posted the maf is rather uncertain including the nose and not involving the two eyes: the right is out of focus and the left is almost clear: fconfuso: ciao good light, laurel Buoni il punto di ripresa e la composizione. Quest'ultima x me aveva margini di miglioramento dando più aria sotto e a sinistra ed evitando il taglio dei baffi e delle zampe. Un'impostazione estremistica (nel senso buono del termine) difende l'uso di fotografare sempre a t.a. con ottiche luminose nei primi piani ma fà a pugni sul discorso pratico ed estetico. Per chiarirmi meglio se il soggetto fosse stato con lo sguardo frontale a te l'enfatizzare la sfocatura scattando a t.a e con una maf chirurgica ti avrebbe permesso di evidenziare entrambi gli occhi e sfruttare il supersfocato delle altre parti del micio. In un'inquadratura diagonale (esempio a 3/4) la maf deve essere invece superchirurgica coinvolgendo entrambi gli occhi del soggetto ... seguendo questa regola l'esperienza ti avrebbe portato a chiudere almeno a f.4. Se osservi bene l'immagine da te postata la maf risulta invece incerta includendo il nasino e non coinvolgendo i 2 occhi: il destro è fuori fuoco e il sinistro è quasi nitido ciao e buona luce, lauro
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
