RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Still Life
  4. » A 300= Crop 480/ Canon 7D II- 70-300 DI IS USM

 
A 300= Crop 480/ Canon 7D II- 70-300 DI IS USM...

CANON 7D I I/70-300 DO IS USM/ A

View gallery (60 photos)

A 300= Crop 480/ Canon 7D II- 70-300 DI IS USM sent on February 17, 2022 (18:33) by Fonte Edmondo. 22 comments, 468 views. [retina]

at 285mm, 1/4000 f/5.6, ISO 1000, tripod.




View High Resolution 20.0 MP  

3 persons like it: Fabrizio Miletto, Gp70, Lamahd


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (6:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What should this shot represent besides a concrete ball?! XD

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (8:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

what to say ....

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (11:48) | This comment has been translated

???

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

???
Quoto Enrico

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (12:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I believe that there is not enough mass to allow it to fall back into a celestial object ... :-D

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (16:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello to all of you.
I think that, we should analyze many shots in this GALLERY.
Greetings and thanks for your intervention.

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well yes, let's say that there are various shots that, objectively, have little to do with astrophotography, so if your proposal is a "provocation"... it fits.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (18:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you for agreeing with Me.
Hello and, Have a good weekend.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It does not seem to me that there are so many shots not relevant in the astro gallery ...
Sure, it's full of shots of the Moon, but everyone does and posts what they can!

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, points of view.
Have a nice weekend.

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (19:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To me it does not seem to be full of shots not relevant in the astro gallery ...

In fact no one wrote that it is "full of shots".
Only I wrote that there are "several", which is quite different.
Those various to which I refer have to do with landscapes, nature, but the relevance to the matter "astrophotography" is nothing short of forced.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 18, 2022 (19:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It seems to me much stranger that, none of those who have spoken so far, who have given a " GREETING ".

avatarsenior
sent on February 18, 2022 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This is because we are basically rude.
Hello.

avatarjunior
sent on February 18, 2022 (23:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello Edmondo,
if I can ..... I do not think it is a good idea to present oneself with a provocation.
I think it would be a good thing if you could better clarify your thinking

avatarsenior
sent on February 19, 2022 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As soon as I saw it I believed in a revised image of the surface of some Jupiter or Saturn satellite with the provocation in the shooting data.
Then I read a concrete ball ........ I must say that the similarity is amazing.
Personally I do not find much offensive from, much less worse (excuse the forcing) than what you see in other galleries.
Indeed I congratulate you because the choice of the subject, the cut of light, the framing and the blurred make the idea of the surface of some remote planet well.
More than Astro-photography.... I would call it Abstract-photography! :-)

HelloGp

avatarsenior
sent on February 19, 2022 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It must be said that the moderation of the astrophotographic gallery is less rigid than in other galleries.
Most of the nightscapes with Milky Way, as per the regulations, however, should be in the Landscapes section. There is not the same rigor that there is for example in the gallery "Macro and flora".

avatarsupporter
sent on February 19, 2022 (15:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarjunior
sent on February 19, 2022 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

well, thank goodness !
personally I asked you gracefully to clarify, I do not see how you can write that I was offended.

avatarsenior
sent on February 19, 2022 (18:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Apart from the mental pipes on the alleged offended (the only offended would seem to be you for the lack of greeting, and there can be), this photo, whatever the reason why you posted it in this gallery, should be removed and moved because it explicitly violates the rules.
It does not matter that then there are others who should undergo the same treatment.
Sorry for the frankness, but the little game has already tired.
Have a nice weekend.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 19, 2022 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Above I made the closure clear and clear.
I have nothing more to say.
After these lines, no one wants me but, I no longer want to "ANSWER".
Regarding the little game as you say if you don't feed it, " ENDS ".
Hello




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me