RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Canon 7D II- 70-300 DO IS USM

 
Canon 7D II- 70-300 DO IS USM...

CANON 7D I I/70-300 DO IS USM/ A

View gallery (60 photos)

Canon 7D II- 70-300 DO IS USM sent on February 15, 2022 (19:51) by Fonte Edmondo. 6 comments, 413 views. [retina]

at 70mm, 1/4000 f/4.5, ISO 1000, hand held.




View High Resolution 20.0 MP  

1 person like it: Star Trek


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2022 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Forgive me but... ISO 1000 1/4000 second for a texture?

avatarsupporter
sent on February 15, 2022 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Meanwhile Hello, so 'you should have introduced.
You see, each of us does our own mathematical calculations, because this is what it is about in photography.
Then remaining on the subject of photography there is a saying: " this loses and this wins " and that is, if you take away and put or vice versa the accounts eventually come back.
I hope I am clear.
As in the first line I greet you.

avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2022 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We are here to talk about photography I do not think we need pleasantries for every intervention that is done on a gallery. That said, your speech forgive me but it is unclear, at least to me. It's a purely technical matter... in photography, in fact, the lowest ISO is always used that the condition, the type of photography and the equipment allow. In this specific case you could use without a shadow of a doubt iso 100, or less if the camera allows it. It does not benefit any advantage to use iso 1000 forgive me, it is not mathematics is simple logic.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 15, 2022 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Meanwhile Hello.
The greeting is part of everyday life, now I know she does not matter to you.
That said, mathematics is part of photography, because photography is made of numbers.
ISOs are numbers, TIME is made of numbers and finally the DIAPHRAGM is number.
If only logic counts for you, go ahead.
Apparently you did not understand the meaning of my saying and that is: if you balance everything you can have a lot of fun, because the final result does not change.
What matters is to see the photo you take exposed well and therefore pleasing to the eye.
By the way you did not express yourself on my photo, how is the final result?.
I greet you again.

avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2022 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Of course it is a question of numbers, but of numbers used with awareness and balance. There are many combinations that give the same correct exposure as a photo, but the combination should not be random but thought out and justified by the type of photo and the subject being taken.
I do not know what to say about the photo sincerely, precisely because I do not find the subject interesting I focused on the technical factor that in my opinion is not justified. I would be interested in understanding why you chose (if you did it consciously) to use iso so high for a subject in full sun (at least it seems) and completely immobile as not to need such fast times. My question is very simple: why did you use high iso?

avatarsupporter
sent on February 15, 2022 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I told you I apply the numbers but, not by chance as you think.
Listen, do your tests, let's see what comes out of it.
I fell in love with the high ISO and, the FAST TIMES and I get GOOD results, that's what counts.
Give us below and let's see what you can do.
I like any kind of photo if exposed well, but you must like the subject, but it is not so.
Again I greet you and, do not ask for anything else.




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me