What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 28, 2011 (23:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, well done! ;-) Molto bella, bravo!  |
| sent on February 09, 2012 (13:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But with this fisheye lens is the focal length of a lower or is distorted in the same way also the longest focal length? Ma con questo obiettivo fa fisheye alla focale piu bassa o è distorto in egual maniera anche alla focale piu lunga? |
| sent on February 09, 2012 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A 10mm is soooo distorted (real fisheye), and less up to 17mm.
Excellent for diving and surfing, where you do not notice much distortion. A 10mm è moooolto distorto (vero e proprio fisheye), e sempre meno fino a 17mm.
Ottimo sott'acqua e per surf, dove non si nota più di tanto la distorsione. |
| sent on February 09, 2012 (23:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Because I was looking for a wide angle but I'd also pushed a 8mm fisheye fisoo for the fact that I do photos for the clubs, but I can not afford the expense for both lenses, looking for a goal that did both and both fisheye wide angle for landscapes. . the canon 8-15 does but it costs 1300 ... and 8-16 sigma fisheye does .. this me advice for my needs? Perche stavo cercando un grandangolare spinto ma mi piacerebbe anche un 8mm fisoo fisheye per il fatto che faccio foto per le discoteche, ma non posso permettermi la spesa per entrambi gli obiettivi, cercavo un obiettivo che facesse sia da fisheye e sia da grandangolare per paesaggi.. il canon 8-15 lo fa ma costa 1300... e il sigma 8-16 non fa fisheye.. questo me lo consigli per le mie esigenze? |
| sent on February 10, 2012 (2:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would recommend the Sigma 8-16 (which I would rather buy too).
Good for landscapes and 8mm I think you're all inside the disco, but it is not very bright.
Otherwise, there is also the tokina 11-16 2.8. Ti consiglierei il Sigma 8-16 (che anzi vorrei comprarmi anche io).
Ottimo per paesaggi e a 8mm credo ti stia dentro tutto in discoteca, ma non è molto luminoso.
Altrimenti c'è anche il tokina 11-16 2.8. |
| sent on February 10, 2012 (18:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
more that I needed to stay inside all the fisheye effect to make creative photos and some details .. with the 8-16 sigma can not otherwise I would have already taken
piu che starci dentro tutto mi serviva l'effetto fisheye per fare foto creative e un po particolari.. con l'8-16 sigma non riesco altrimenti lo avrei gia preso
|
| sent on March 19, 2013 (0:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Do not tell me!
Thank you! Non me lo dire!
Grazie! |
| sent on August 19, 2013 (19:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Exceptional, creepy!
How did you get with the suit? In a couple of month or so delivery for Aussie too and I was considering whether to buy it or not, or take a case like this
You had raised the issue?
What do you recommend? Eccezionale, da brividi!
Come ti sei trovato con lo scafandro? Tra un paio di mesetti parto anch'io per Aussie e stavo valutando se acquistarlo o meno, o prendere una custodia tipo queste www.amazon.it/gp/product/B00169HXW2/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_3?ie=UTF8&psc=
Ti eri posto il problema?
Cosa mi consigli? |
user24517 | sent on August 19, 2013 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb Stupenda |
| sent on August 24, 2013 (11:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you!
For the case depends on what you want to do with it.
The SPL is made for the conditions to surf. If you want to take pictures in calm water is fine as posted by you (also much easier to carry when traveling). If you want to take pictures under water serves quite the opposite! Grazie!
Per la custodia dipende cosa vuoi farci.
La SPL è fatta apposta per le condizioni da surf. Se vuoi fare foto in acqua calma va benissimo quella postata da te (anche molto più comoda da trasportare in viaggio). Se vuoi fare foto in immersione serve invece tutt'altro! |
| sent on August 24, 2013 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ah ... say that the housing is not good for photos in the water a little more lively? D: ah... dici che la custodia non vada bene per foto in acqua un pò più movimentata? D: |
| sent on August 25, 2013 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I that case I'd use it just to take pictures at the lake :) Io quella custodia la userei solo per fare foto al lago :) |
| sent on August 25, 2013 (9:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful! bellissima! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
