RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Rolling Stones

 
Rolling Stones...

Ritratti

View gallery (41 photos)



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 01, 2022 (14:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful portrait with a black white that fits very well, as you are with the Sigma 35 cheap ..

avatarjunior
sent on February 01, 2022 (18:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very well, beyond the sharpness that is its strong point it is just a pleasure to use it and hold it in your hand. It holds the flares well and the distortion is corrected well by the machine, I would say for now promoted ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on April 28, 2023 (17:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice ..
congratulations!
Cg

avatarjunior
sent on April 28, 2023 (20:37) | This comment has been translated

Thank you!

avatarsupporter
sent on June 04, 2025 (22:35) | This comment has been translated

So nice!

avatarsenior
sent on December 02, 2025 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Bel Bn

avatarsenior
sent on December 02, 2025 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Can I say that I find it totally nonsensical?

avatarsenior
sent on December 02, 2025 (18:56) | This comment has been translated

I agree

avatarjunior
sent on December 03, 2025 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the feedback Sorriso

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (8:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I don't find it nonsensical, a subject is missing that is out of the frame, she looks at and shows the magazine
We can discuss why she does it in underwear
It's not the photo of the year, but not so bad either.

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (12:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion it is more a matter of unfortunate framing, it would have worked better vertically, with the whole magazine. She who doesn't look into the camera is there but something is missing.

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (12:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

By dint of seeing girls in a winking attitude, my brain foamed. This looks like an ordinary babe put there with a magazine for what purpose? Should she be sensual, perhaps a little transgressive because she has the Rolling Stone in her hand as a provocation?

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Maybe the babe dreams of Johnny Depp between her tits?

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (12:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You will understand what is interesting :-D

avatarsupporter
sent on December 03, 2025 (13:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well, it reminds me of the photos that still at the time of "when there was the paper RollinSton" they published in the readers' mail: meaningless snapshots mostly, this one at least is well done as light and b&w.

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (13:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If on a semiotic level an image is deflated, it has no potential, what do you do with the beautiful lighting and the beautiful b/w?
I often see this reasoning made about many photos that do not say anything particular and yet are "promoted" because they are done well.
Isn't it that by dint of seeing the best of the worst you end up settling?

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

doing a bit of a double somersault, but to clarify:
https://d7hftxdivxxvm.cloudfront.net/?height=800&quality=50&resize_to=fit&src=https%3A%2F%2Fd32dm0rphc51dk.cloudfront.net%2FjBVGmPLUivEQKFQQkEcKgQ%2Fnormalized.jpg

avatarsupporter
sent on December 03, 2025 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Leveling out is certainly easy, natural I would say as it is easy but I don't see all this sin here on Juza, it is clear that in the middle there are all in the vast majority. If we then take advantage of the even heavy judgment or the strong criticism and from there an improvement is born, very good: that's why I have repeatedly insisted on inserting the "I don't like" button.

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Vincent Peters, if I'm not mistaken, photographs celebrities on the cover. The intent is clear and the commercial purpose as well. He doesn't make a fuss.
But on photos like this, what's the point?

avatarsenior
sent on December 03, 2025 (14:12)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Fotografa celebrità o modelle, le foto fatte in metro sono spettacolari.
Ma quale é il suo scopo? Lo senti parlare di bellezza di eleganza ecc...
Perché non posso nel piccolo fare scatti che siano belli per se a livello ritrattistico?
Se la tizia era famosa e magari aveva un legame con Depp sicuramente lo scatto prendeva un altro spessore.
Ma perché non posso fare scatti a belle donne e stop?
Per me hanno assolutamente la stessa valenza di quella alla famosa solo che non ti pagano e non vai in copertina ma lo scopo alla fine lo stesso é
Molte foto di Giampaolo barbieri che per me é stato uno dei più grandi fotografi italiani avevano come scopo il mostrare la bellezza nelle sue forme



RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me