What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 17, 2022 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice and with a PDR of great effect
Carlo molto bella e con un PDR di grande effetto
Carlo |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (12:06) | This comment has been translated
Fantastic! |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Carlo and Ciriaco! Greetings! Grazie Carlo e Ciriaco! Un saluto! |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (12:46) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (13:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful.
This image reminds me of water, sand and bucket by the sea to build castles. :-) Bellissima.
Questa immagine Mi ricorda acqua, sabbia e secchiello in riva al mare a costruire i castelli.  |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (14:24) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (16:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Extraordinary! there is no need to say anything else. Hello Piero Straordinaria! non serve dire altro. Ciao Piero |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fantastic
Hello, Renato Fantastica
Ciao, Renato |
| sent on January 17, 2022 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very useful function that there is on the sony from the A7R3 ;-) funzione utilissima che c'è sulle sony dalla A7R3  |
| sent on January 18, 2022 (0:36) | This comment has been translated
Really nice shot! |
| sent on January 18, 2022 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Masterpiece
Health Capolavoro
saluti |
| sent on January 18, 2022 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, almost unreal.
Gianluigi Bella, quasi irreale.
Gianluigi |
| sent on January 18, 2022 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A sci-fi landscape, congratulations!
Hello
Robert Un paesaggio fantascientifico, complimenti!
Ciao
Roberto |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (10:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot ... but generally at 60 seconds the stars come as stripes not in a point way as in this shot; therefore either double exposure, or replacement of the sky, or use of star trackers; too bad that the author does not specify. Since some previous photos have given rise to extensive discussions, it would have been better to specify. Mt Bello scatto ... ma in genere a 60 secondi le stelle vengono come strisce non in maniera puntiforme come in questo scatto; dunque o doppia esposizione, o sostituzione del cielo, o utilizzo di star tracker; peccato che l'autore non specifichi. Visto che alcune precedenti foto hanno dato origine a ampie discussioni, sarebbe stato meglio specificare. mt |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (11:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much to all!
@Maurizio Trifilidis, I specified that it is a single exposure. No pursuers and no replacement of the sky.
If you look carefully by enlarging the file to 100% the stars are not point-like. In addition, the clouds that moved rapidly in front of the stars mitigated the swipe effect. Grazie mille a tutti!
@Maurizio Trifilidis, ho specificato che è una singola esposizione. Nessun inseguitore e nessuna sostituzione del cielo.
Se guardi bene ingrandendo il file al 100% le stelle non sono puntiformi. In più le nuvole che si muovevano rapidamente davanti alle stelle ne hanno mitigato l'effetto strisciata. |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The movement of the clouds is consistent with the time used; the movement of the stars is point-like and remains, in my opinion, inconsistent with the declared time; the swipe effect of the clouds cannot change the geometric shape of the stars as it would in any case be distributed homogeneously on each individual star; moreover, the same movement of the clouds could not be homogeneous over the entire shooting area that concerns the sky. Il movimento delle nuvole è coerente con il tempo utilizzato; il movimento delle stelle è puntiforme e rimane, nella mia opinione, non coerente con il tempo dichiarato; l'effetto strisciata delle nuvole non può modificare la forma geometrica delle stelle in quanto si ripartirebbe in ogni caso in modo omogeneo su ogni singola stella; inoltre, lo stesso movimento delle nuvole non potrebbe essere omogeneo su tutta l'area di scatto che riguarda il cielo. |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (17:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice with great choice of pdr.
A greeting.
Nicola Molto bella con ottima scelta del pdr.
Un saluto.
Nicola |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (20:02) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Maurizio, his hypotheses are completely wrong, the clouds are more or less dense according to the area of the sky and the stars depending on the angle taken of the sky have a different rotational speed, the closer they are to the polar and the less they move. I agree that normally with a 20mm on FF and 60sec of exposure the stars are more crawled, but sometimes the case puts its own as in this case, in which I repeat, if you look closely the stars are not point-like. As always I am available to show her the original raw. @Maurizio, le sue ipotesi sono completamente errate, le nuvole sono più o meno fitte in base alla zona del cielo e le stelle a seconda dell'angolazione ripresa del cielo hanno un velocità di rotazione differente, più sono vicine alla polare e meno si spostano. Concordo che normalmente con un 20mm su FF e 60sec di esposizione le stelle vengono più strisciate, ma ogni tanto il caso ci mette del suo come in questo caso, in cui ripeto, se si osserva bene le stelle non sono puntiformi. Come sempre sono disponibile a farle visionare il raw originale. |
| sent on January 19, 2022 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
On the stars I have already expressed my opinion and I have no reason to change it: if you “ I agree that normally with a 20mm on FF and 60sec of exposure the stars are more swiped „ do not seem to me "completely wrong": the typical strip is not seen and “ the case that puts us of its „ is a hypothesis of randomness that I generally do not contemplate.
Over, the shot was taken at 22.59, that is about 5 hours after sunset, when the sky is obviously completely dark while in the sky of the shot are clearly visible yellow and red tones (very visible if you explode the saturation) typical of a photo taken shortly after sunset; at what time was the shot taken? I can not think that a professional who tests a new Flagship Nikon has the wrong shooting exif .... but of course anything is possible. Sulle stelle ho già espresso la mia opinione e non ho motivo di cambiarla: se lei " Concordo che normalmente con un 20mm su FF e 60sec di esposizione le stelle vengono più strisciate" non mi sembrano "completamente errate": la tipica strisciata non si vede e " il caso che ci mette del suo" è un ipotesi di casualità che io in genere non contemplo.
Peraltro lo scatto è stato effettuato alle 22.59, cioè 5 ore circa dopo il tramonto, quando il cielo è ovviamente del tutto scuro mentre nel cielo dello scatto sono ben visibili tonalità gialle e rosse ( molto visibili se si esplode la saturazione) tipiche di una foto scattata poco dopo il tramonto; a che ora è stato effettuato lo scatto? Non posso pensare che un professionista che testi una nuova ammiraglia Nikon abbia gli exif di scatto errati .... ma ovviamente tutto è possibile. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
