What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 29, 2013 (9:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here the only thing wrong is the number 23, which I do not see as much cestistawow! Wow wow!
If there was a much higher light, you could close at least f / 8, a little alsare the iso and hold to fire the ball well.
So, with almost all of the shoulders, you lose the person that could just be the ball, contested by all. Qui l'unica cosa sbagliata è il nr 23 che non lo vedo molto come cestista
Se ci fosse stata una luce molto più alta, avresti potuto chiudere almeno a f/8, alsare un pochino gli iso e tenere a fuoco anche la palla.
Così, con quasi tutti di spalle, si perde il soggetto che avrebbe potuto essere proprio la palla, contesa da tutti. |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree on the 23, but did not pass anybody ....
I will not deny that I really like this blur instead, it seems to give depth and detach the background that would be very intrusive .... Concordo sul 23, eppure non faceva passar nessuno....
Non ti nascondo che a me questo effetto sfuocato invece piace molto, mi pare dia profondità e stacchi lo sfondo che sarebbe molto invadente.... |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (12:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I mean that it is all blurry except 13 (among other things, from behind) I can not find an interesting point (I speak of interest of the image) in the picture.
On the other hand, I find that with a tele (or the 100 macro, effective 150mm), as open as possible, and shooting spot on the ball, the attenziona would have fallen on the ball itself (and then all of the athletes gestures) instead that on the back of 13, which does not seem to be much interesting.
intendo dire che essendo tutto sfocato tranne il 13 (tra l'altro, di spalle) non riesco a trovare un punto interessante (parlo di interesse di immagine) nella foto.
Per contro, trovo che con un tele (o comunque col 100 macro, effettivo a 150mm), aprendo il più possibile, e sparando spot sulla palla, l'attenziona sarebbe ricaduta sulla palla stessa (e poi su tutti i gesti degli atleti) invece che sulla schiena del 13 che non mi sembra sia gran che interessante.
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
