What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 26, 2021 (14:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In such a disposed subject, focal data and distance, if you focus in the center of the figure you have to close more. Otherwise the too small plane of fire leaves no escape.
As you want to achieve just that. In un soggetto così disposto, dati focale e distanza, se focheggi al centro della figura devi chiudere di più. Altrimenti il piano di fuoco troppo ridotto non lascia scampo.
A meno che non volessi ottenere proprio questo. |
| sent on October 26, 2021 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello @Diogene ! I wanted to focus attention only on the center and exclude the face otherwise I would have shot at least at f8 or even at 5.6, but these are academic conversations that you obviously know. Thank you very much for the passage and for noticing that the face (deliberately) is not in focus. The point in focus is the pelvis, precisely the back. :-o
Thanks @Diogene ciao @Diogene ! Volevo puntare l'attenzione solo sul centro ed escludere il volto altrimenti avrei scattato almeno ad f8 oppure anche a 5,6, ma queste sono conversazioni accademiche che tu ovviamente conosci. Ti ringrazio molto per il passaggio e per aver notato che il volto ( volutamente ) non è a fuoco. Il punto a fuoco è il bacino, precisamente la parte posteriore. 
Grazie @Diogene |
| sent on October 27, 2021 (8:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If that's what you wanted, okay. I don't like them, but they are subjective choices. Se è quello che volevi, ok. A me non piace, ma sono scelte soggettive. |
| sent on October 27, 2021 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Diogene I don't dwell on the photos I don't like. What attracted you to ??? ;-) @Diogene io non mi soffermo sulle foto che non mi piacciono. A te cosa ti ha attratto ???  |
| sent on October 27, 2021 (15:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In a forum like this, photos are proposed and opinions are expressed.
O at least it should be.
All here, nothing attracted me at all. In un forum come questo si propongono foto e si esprimono pareri.
O almeno così dovrebbe essere.
Tutto qua, non mi ha attratto proprio niente. |
| sent on October 27, 2021 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Diogene thank you for your opinion, which no one prevents you from expressing: we would miss more! I am convinced, moreover, that this photo did not attract you anything ;-) @Diogene ti ringrazio per il tuo parere, che nessuno ti impedisce di esprimere: ci mancherebbe altro ! Sono convinto ,inoltre , che di questa foto non ti ha attirato proprio niente |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
