What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 14, 2021 (13:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The lamppost in the foreground is in focus ... Cyclists under no ... = incorrect shutter speed - on the others, in addition to the f 2.8 absolutely to be avoided, even the shutter speed, evidently must be reviewed Il lampione in primo piano e' a fuoco ... I ciclisti sotto no ... = tempo di scatto non corretto - sulle altre, oltre alla f 2.8 assolutamente da evitare, anche il tempo di scatto, evidentemente va rivisto |
| sent on October 14, 2021 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Maury thanks for your answer.
I didn't understand what you mean about shutter speed, how does it affect the portion of photos in focus? I put it so fast just to avoid the move on the cyclists.
Instead as for the diaphragm I realized I was wrong I wanted to give light and blur the background but I did the calculations wrong Ciao Maury grazie della tua risposta.
Non ho capito cosa intendi circa il tempo di scatto, come fa a influire sulla porzione di foto a fuoco? L'ho messo così veloce proprio per evitare il mosso sui ciclisti.
Invece per quanto riguarda il diaframma ho capito di aver sbagliato volevo dare luce e sfocare lo sfondo ma ho fatto male i calcoli |
| sent on October 14, 2021 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In analog, with 1/1000" you stopped almost everything - in digital, in particular with the new sensors > 20 mpx things change - x a distant subject and an f 50mm, they would have been + that adequate - x close subjects and with f > 100mm, are no longer enough - personally, in these contexts, I prefer to use panning - long times, closed aperture, burst and uncertain result, but when they succeed, (even with a modest Canon RP), they make the dynamism of the scene well - the shots in dynamic contexts, require patience and experimentation - in each specific context its parameters - MTB is different from the enduro race on a motorcycle - triathlon from rugby etc ... ! x every situation you have to know well the behavior of the equipment you use and it is extremely reductive to argue that ML is better than slr - in some contexts where reactivity is needed, I prefer the 1d4, in others where the precision of maf is needed, the RP In analogico, con 1/1000" fermavi quasi tutto - in digitale, in particolare con i nuovi sensori > 20 mpx le cose cambiano - x un soggetto lontano e una f 50mm, sarebbero stati + che adeguati - x soggetti vicini e con f > 100mm, non bastano più - personalmente, in questi contesti, preferisco usare il panning - tempi lunghi, diaframma chiuso, raffica e ....... risultato incerto, ma quando riescono, ( anche con una modesta Canon RP), rendono bene la dinamicità della scena - gli scatti in contesti dinamici, richiedono pazienza e sperimentazione - in ogni specifico contesto i suoi parametri - MTB e' diverso dalla gara di enduro in moto - il triathlon dal rugby ecc ... ! x ogni situazione devi conoscere bene il comportamento dell'attrezzatura che usi ed e' estremamente riduttivo sostenere che ML sia meglio di reflex - in alcuni contesti dove serve reattività, preferisco la 1d4, in altri dove serve la precisione di maf, la RP |
| sent on October 14, 2021 (19:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To stop close subjects as in this case with length >100 are you telling me that I should have increased the shutter speed maybe to 1/1500 or more? Per fermare soggetti vicini come in questo caso con lunghezza >100 mi stai dicendo che avrei dovuto aumentare la velocità di scatto magari a 1/1500 o più? |
| sent on October 14, 2021 (19:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Basically yes ....! Sostanzialmente si ....! |
| sent on October 11, 2024 (10:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Times and openings are fine, the focus is what is not good, it should be on the two cyclists in front, not in the center of the group. In these cases rather than using manual focus, it's always better to use continuous AF and focus on the moment Tempi e aperture vanno bene, il fuoco è ciò che non va bene, dovrebbe stare sui due ciclisti davanti, non al centro del gruppo. In questi casi piuttosto che usare un fuoco manuale, è sempre meglio usare af continuo e mettere a fuoco in base al momento |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
