What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 01, 2021 (12:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, congratulations!
Health,
Giorgio Molto bella, complimenti!
Saluti,
Giorgio |
| sent on October 01, 2021 (12:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Gorgio, thanks for the compliment.
He is the first dark nebula that I take back in my life and I must say that they are interesting objects. Often set in asterisms of very colorful stars as in this case, they make the picture very pleasant to observe.
A greeting
Gp Ciao Gorgio, grazie per il complimento.
E' la prima nebulosa oscura che riprendo in vita mia e devo dire che sono oggetti interessanti. Spesso incastonate in asterismi di stelle molto colorate come in questo caso, rendono il quadretto molto piacevole da osservare.
Un saluto
Gp |
| sent on October 01, 2021 (23:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not so much the lack of stars that makes it "visible", but the lack of background sky.
He would seem an impossible challenge: to photograph something that has no emissions or reflections, in a backlight given by a sky that every astrophotographer wants as black as possible.
Estetically perhaps it does not have the "wow" effect of bright nebulae, but this makes us reflect on Olbers' paradox.
Compliments!
Non è tanto la mancanza di stelle che la rende "visibile", ma la mancanza di cielo di sfondo.
Parrebbe una sfida impossibile: fotografare una cosa che non ha emissioni o riflessioni, in un controluce dato da un cielo che ogni astrofotografo vuole più nero possibile.
Esteticamente forse non ha l'effetto "wow" delle nebulose luminose, ma questa fa riflettere sul paradosso di Olbers.
Complimenti!
|
| sent on October 02, 2021 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ It is not so much the lack of stars that makes it "visible", but the lack of background sky.
He would seem an impossible challenge: to photograph something that has no emissions or reflections, in a backlight given by a sky that every astrophotographer wants as black as possible.
Estetically perhaps it does not have the "wow" effect of bright nebulae, but this makes us reflect on Olbers' paradox.
Compliments! „
Grea good observation ;-)
Thank you.
Hello
Gp " Non è tanto la mancanza di stelle che la rende "visibile", ma la mancanza di cielo di sfondo.
Parrebbe una sfida impossibile: fotografare una cosa che non ha emissioni o riflessioni, in un controluce dato da un cielo che ogni astrofotografo vuole più nero possibile.
Esteticamente forse non ha l'effetto "wow" delle nebulose luminose, ma questa fa riflettere sul paradosso di Olbers.
Complimenti!"
Ottima osservazione 
Grazie a te.
Ciao
Gp |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
