What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 26, 2021 (10:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More than anything else micromossed statue. :-|
The next time better to optimize the shooting technique by raising, for example, the iso and opening the aperture (not very useful beyond f.13). ;-)
(imho)
Hello, Lauro Più che altro statua micromossa. 
La prossima volta meglio ottimizzare la tecnica di scatto alzando, per esempio, gli iso e aprendo il diaframma (non molto utile oltre f.13). 
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on September 26, 2021 (10:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the suggestions, I will try to put them into practice.
In fact, despite the light conditions would have allowed it, I shot at 1/25.
Cordiali greetings Grazie per i suggerimenti,cercherò di metterli in pratica.
In effetti,nonostante le condizioni di luce lo avrebbero permesso,ho scattato ad 1/25.
Cordiali saluti |
| sent on September 26, 2021 (12:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, but even if I had raised the iso, the aperture to those values brings with it the diffraction = collapse of sharpness ;-) Si ma anche se avessi alzato gli iso, il diaframma a quei valori porta con se la diffrazione = crollo della nitidezza |
| sent on September 26, 2021 (16:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was talking about shooting with faster times, for example 1/250. Parlavo di scattare con tempi più veloci,ad esempio 1/250. |
| sent on September 26, 2021 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With higher iso you would have obtained a faster time by solving the micromosso but it did not cancel the loss of sharpness due to the extreme closure of the diaphragm ... we had to work on two fronts ;-)
You Can!
Hello, Lauro Con iso più alti si avrebbe ottenuto un tempo più rapido risolvendo il micromosso ma non si annullava la perdita di nitidezza dovuta alla chiusura estrema del diaframma ... si doveva lavorare su due fronti
You Can!
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on September 27, 2021 (0:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok. All clear.
Thanks for the valuable advice. Ok. Tutto chiaro.
Grazie dei preziosi consigli. |
| sent on October 08, 2021 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice! yes, as already noted in other comments, pity for 1/25, a shutter speed too long, considering that the diaphragm was kept closed to the maximum and the iso were the minimum union. Simpatica! si, come già rilevato in altri commenti, peccato per1/25,un tempo di scatto troppo lungo, considerando che il diaframma era tenuto chiuso al massimo e gli iso erano il minimo sindacale. |
| sent on October 09, 2021 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True, thank you for the right observations. ;-) Vero,grazie per le giuste osservazioni. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
